THE PX6 FILES – Aggressive Christians In Action

Hill HATES Prophecy!

By: Gen. Jim

For chapter 11 (The Oracle’s Daughter) p.79 of his 331 page book he writes: “Lila now called Deborah, steps forward & launches into a prophecy”. “I say my beloved”, she intones. “I say that I will crush them, I say that I will scatter them as dust in the streets”. He continues to degrade my wife (who has the spirit/gift of prophecy – 1 Cor. 12:10 – “Sometimes Deborah gets down on the floor, thrashing about in a wordless muddle of sound”. “Thrashing about?” Just how does Hill know this? Was he there? Personally I’ve never seen Deborah “THRASH ABOUT”. Nor have I heard “WORDLESS MUDDLE OF SOUND”. If Hill is referring to “tongues” – which is also a gift (1 Cor. 12:10 puts “tongues” & “interpretation of tongues” together) – the Bible does not call them “a wordless muddle of sound”. In fact, the Bible says “there are diversities of activities” (12:6) v.7 says “the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the PROFIT of all”. “Profit” (Greek, sumpheru = advantage, be better for, be expedient etc.

Paul makes it clear when he wrote: “…if I come to you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you unless I speak to you either by revelation…by prophesying, or by teaching?”, 1 Cor. 14:6. He goes on to explain: “Even things…when they make a sound, unless they make a distinction in the sounds, how will it be known what is piped or played? For if the trumpet makes an uncertain sound, who will prepare for battle? So likewise you, unless you utter by the tongue words easy to understand, how will it be known what is spoken. For you will be speaking into the air” – 1 Cor. 14: 7-9.

Paul says in v.12, “…since you are zealous for spiritual gifts, let it be for the edification of the Church that you seek to excel”. The whole of chapter 14 is about prophecy: “Pursue love, & DESIRE spiritual gifts, but ESPECIALLY that you may PROPHESY”, 14:1. Paul distinguishes between personal tongues (speaking to God) for no one understands him (or her), v.2. Then he writes about prophecy, v.3. This is for “edification & exhortation & comfort to men”, v.3. He says in v.4, “He (or she) who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the Church”, v.4. Nowhere does Paul mock tongues or prophecy, as does Harrison Hill (his “queen”, Maura Schmierer, does the same!).

I could give a lengthy Bible study here but my point being “Deborah has not merely THRASHED ABOUT in a WORDLESS MUDDLE of SOUND”. She always knows what she is doing under the inspiration of the Spirit. Even Hill admits this: “…when the Holy Spirit seizes CONTROL of her body…” Hill knows ZERO about what we did or did not do in our meetings. Do you think the Holy Spirit would not move upon an open vessel – jerking, speaking, demonstrating? Old time Pentecostals were mocked over this as well. What Hill has done is take much of what those who left – not ESCAPED!!! – those who couldn’t ENDURE HARDSHIPS! – spitting in his ear things that degrade the moving of God’s Spirit.

Don’t Forget!

Hill at least lets his readers know that we are not just one more “Church” in Sacramento. On page 82 he writes: “It its relentlessness, its exhaustion, its personality, – destroying uniformity, everyday life at ACMTC operated as a near-perfect mechanism of control”. We were (still are!) an ARMY of God. We had (still) a vision & mission – “Taking Jesus to All the World”. We did this. We were not just one more worthless Church or outreach playing Christianity. We took Mt. 28:19 serious: “Go therefore & make disciples of all the nations…” How many churches do this? I mean teach & train Christian soldiers for spiritual conflicts on a world scale?

Did you know “disciple” means “a pupil, to instruct, to teach, a disciplined one”? In short, to be disciplined. What is the backbone, the foundation of militaries of the world? When we started ACMTC in earnest we challenged ALL (close to 75 at one time – not all lived in Camp, many came to our meeting – all full house we had over 100, counting teens.). We were not trying to have a mega church. No! We were H.Q. Company! We brought whole denominations/churches under the ACMTC flag. All were working hard to be “trainers”/”instructors”.

Poor Maura!

Hill feels sorry for this drag-a-long. We even promoted her to Captain in hopes of making her more responsible – we failed! As is the style & intent of Hill, he writes: “As the group descended further into madness, Maura’s confusion only grew stronger”, p.82. Maura was a SLOW learner. But we did care for her despite what she has said & done. We did take into account the years of POT usage (other drugs as well), her promiscuity & obvious slowness to perceive, we hoped – in time – she would be a leader in ACMTC.

Hill writes as though Maura cared so much for her family. The truth was, she was a poor mother. Sarah, our (then) daughter used to take care of her kids a lot. We, even before ACMTC, helped out with food & other domestic things that she could not come to grips with. Hill writes: “She was terrified of losing her family…” This is not true whatsoever. She pushed her family off onto us as much as she could. Hill treats her like we abused her. Not true. What is true, we did scold her at times hoping she would snap out of her despondency & dependency. Hill’s whole genre of Maura is not true. We know more than he does. It is an insult to God & us or the way he portrays this leach. We worked with her for 5 years. There were times when she seemed to make progress. To be honest, Maura was slow but we did love & care for her. We wanted her to “make it!” If those two men had never came to us, confessing their sexual involvement with Maura, we would have never put her out. We wanted to see her overcome. This was (still is!) the underpinning message – OVERCOME. Well, Hill’s fixation with Maura goes throughout the book. But Hill was suppose to be writing about Sarah – the Oracle’s Daughter.

Plaintiff

This is the whole reason for this introduction to PX6 Files. To show our readers what led to her $20 M. lawsuit. Of course Hill and thousands of others believe Maura’s justification. But a child can see that she contradicts herself time & time again in her document. What is missing is sexual/physical child abuse in her doc. It was after this filing she began to claim ABUSE.

“Plaintiff”

By: Gen. Jim – 6/26/26

Here it is folks. I have my copy of the declaration of Maura A. Schmierer as offer of proof for default proceeding. This doc. Is 25 pages, NO. 501147, Superior Court of Calif. CO. of Sacramento filed by Maura’s attorney Robert D. Blasier. The defendants are Free Love Ministries, aka ACMTC, Jim M. Green, aka Brig. Gen. Jim Green & Brig Gen. Lila Green, Lieutenant Col. Steve Schmierer aka Philip Jordan, 2nd Lieutenant Bernard Bandaras aka Andrew Edwards, Captain David Gane. (Note: Those were the ranks they had when the lawsuit was filed, they now have different ranks.) I’ve waited all these years to go over this doc with our followers, and any and all who would be interested.

The $20 million dollar suit was filed against us back in 1987. Harrison Hill’s The Oracle’s Daughter (released April, 2026) speaks more about Maura than Sarah – the daughter of Generals Jim & Deborah Lila Green. Hill’s readers are perturbed to say the least. The book is suppose to be about about Sarah Green, not Maura Schmierer (MS). She still cries over the “mistreatment” dished out by Gen. Deborah/ACMTC.

Years of Persecution & Oppression

One must read our PX2 Files for complete background. MS & her attorney, B.B. ENGINEERED this “BIG LIE” and made scandalous accusations against us as individuals & as a group. To this day (June 26. 2026) MS still can’t let go of her BIG LIE & find peace.

The Doc

On page 2 she tells her first lie!: “The group consists of approximately 25 members (including children) who live in 4 communal houses…” At the time of the law suit we were nearly 100 persons in camp. We had over a dozen Natives from Canada living with us (for training), besides all of us.

2^nd Lie

“Almost all members in the group have legally changed their names”. This is not true. Very few had actually changed their names (see PX2 & PX4,5 Files. We deal with this issue. Funny I never changed my name, nor did Sarah or Joshua (daughter/son). And her two sons to this day have not changed their names. Besides, name changing is Biblical!)

MS sues Captain David Gane (Col. David Wright today). Why? “Four businesses known as ‘Art Shops’ which I believe are owned by Free Love Ministries or defendant Captain David Gane (Col. David Wright today), a long time member & leader of the group”. (What group?) She continues, “It is my belief that DG has provided much of the financial resources available to FLM”. Is this any reason to sue David? What did he do against you Maura? What he did was give you employment!

Another Lie

“The leaders… ‘Generals’… their authority touches even such personal matter as who divorces…” True, we had to deal with problems in marriages but we never told anyone who to marry & who to divorce. This is a repeated LIE!

Another Lie

She bitches about baby pictures. On page 3 she writes: “At one point my husband threw away all of our children’s baby pictures along with everything else which could reflect on ‘yesterday’s love’”. It is a known fact that MS had nearly zero love/care for her children. She pushed them off on Sarah many times to care for them. She had other children by other men, not Steve’s. “My husband THREW AWAY ALL…” Well now, just where did those photos come from posted on the internet & in the videos made about you? I recall one pic of your small child completely NAKED – you were so proud of that one!

MS confesses on p.3 that indeed she worked at the Art Shop: “up until the time of my being put under strong disciplinary measures I had been working a FULL TIME (my emph.) job at the Art Shop in Placerville”. (Note: our critics claim we kept a “watchful eye” on all our members. Well, this was another LIE (even Dr. Phil said this on his show when he interviewed MS). We had 5 Art Shops to operate. Tell me, please!, just how could Deborah & I keep an “eye” on those at work? And, when we were out of country – for weeks! – how was this done? Allow me to cite Dr. Phil (who was one of the enemies of ACMTC at that time):

Quote from the Dr. Phil Show Sept. 21, 2006 (Opening Sequence)

“Thank you very much. I want you to imagine you’re growing up in the US, right? I mean that’s the dream where we have freedom. But instead choosing to live in isolation with a group ruled by generals that call themselves God’s Army. Well, today we’re talking to people who escaped from what they say is a bizarre religious community. They say they had no money, no TV, no cars and no contact with family on the outside. They also say they lived under the eyes, the watchful eyes of these so-called trusted leaders who made sure a high standard of holiness was maintained. Now Maura was one of the first to sign up, and she brought her 12-year-old daughter Rebekah with her. They say children were abused and adults who questioned authority were belittled and humiliated. Maura says her worst punishment was being locked in a windowless shed for 10 weeks with only stale peanut butter sandwiches.”.

There are several “lies” in his statement – “No cars” is a lie! “No money” is a lie; all our people got paid! “No contact with family” is a lie. However, when family members got violent we had to step in. This was done. We tried to have peace with hostile parents but it did not work in all cases.

MS continues p.3: “we were forbidden to go to bed before 10:00 pm, & often work kept us up until 11:00 pm”. There was No “law” given! Deborah and I were the ones stayed up late (but not always). We were responsible for the well being of all at Ft. Freedom. MS just lies about many things. Keep in mind $20 million dollars was a mighty incentive to do so!!!

They Held Me Captive!

As I have said for decades now, MS lies & contradicts herself over & over. [Our PX2 Files Trilogy has dozens of newspaper quotes showing this.]. “I was with FLM for 5 years before BEING BUSTED in Jan. of 1987”. All the news outlets of those days report that we HELD MS CAPTIVE. She eventually ESCAPED!

ALLEGATIONS VS. THE TRUTH

LIFE IN THE “SHED

AN article by Jan Held in the Thursday, May 11, 1989 issue of The Biggs News Butte County Reporter reported the following: “[Maura Schmierer], 41, stated in her suit she was imprisoned by the ACMTC in January of 1987 and forced to live in a shed.” Melinda Welsh, who wrote a lengthy article in a 1989 issue of the Sacramento News & Review, reported that “According to the lawsuit…the organization [ACMTC]…forced her [Maura Schmierer]…and another banished sect member to move for 10 weeks into a 5-by-12-foot wooden shed, in which they could not stand upright.” This shed was supposedly “unheated” and “unlighted.” Rick Longley of the Mercury-Register cited the claim that Maura Schmierer was “abused by the group and forced to live in unsanitary conditions.” Do these allegations have factual support? Was Maura really “imprisoned” and “forced to live in a shed” at ACMTC Headquarters? Absolutely not and absolutely not!

Her pitiful genre of being HELD CAPTIVE was repeated over & over all these years.

A FLAGRANT CONTRADICTION

PASTOR Jerry Axtell counseled Maura after she left ACMTC the last time. His testimony is very interesting. He is quoted in the Sunday, May 7, 1989 issue of The Sacramento Bee, and he admitted, “[Maura Schmierer] was never held physically captive.” Wait…”[Maura Schmierer] was NEVER HELD PHYSICALLY CAPTIVE”???!!! Was Maura physically “imprisoned” and “forced to live in a shed” or was she “NEVER held physically captive” as her counselor claimed? It seems we have two conflicting accounts. Maura told her counselor that she was somehow emotionally imprisoned but not physically imprisoned, while in her lawsuit she claimed physical imprisonment.

[Note: see our Px1 Files where we list 12 articles [1984-1989] written in Sacramento Bee News (paper). You’ll see that MS states that she ESCAPED, not OUSTED by us!]

On p.4 MS begins her sad saga of being “judged”. This is true. We, as a group, dealt with her adultery problem, which is Scriptural. She tells the court, “I had been ‘forsaken’”. She claims we named her this but in one of her letters (found in the Px2 Files) she goes on to tell the court that “They further stated that in shame I was to wear a black scarf at all times…”. This is another LIE. She chose to look like a “spook”, black scarf & white sack dress!! She writes, “I was terrified. I didn’t know what I had done to cause such rejection” (pp.4 & 5). She knew! She had been dealt with several times beforehand on her sexual problem. This was before we had to dismiss her from her Captain position. Remember, she was a hippie for years – sex was all part of that lifestyle. Both Deborah (Lila) & I were in that lifestyle also. Neither one of us denied our “free love” as she has.

Her Claims

If one reads all the CA. Newspapers & watch all the docs about her & us, it is apparent that she has two genres – 10 weeks locked in a cold, dirty shed with only 6 stale peanut butter sandwiches a day & 6 months.

MAURA’S “PEANUT-BUTTER DIET”

In the Chico Enterprise-Record, Thursday, May 4, 1989 issue, it is reported that Maura was “forced to live…on a diet of peanut butter sandwiches.”First of all, Maura chose to eat what she wanted to eat. Notably, for a while, she and her son worked in the ACMTC cafeteria as the cleanup crew. She chose that job. Every day they would gorge down any leftovers they wanted. They would even go around drinking all the sodas that people had left on the tables. In fact, Maura started gaining so much weight, she asked for a different job assignment. Again, we must recall that Maura had her own money. At any point, she could have easily gone to a store or restaurant and eaten herself into a coma. Plus, Maura could have called her mother to obtain money or food whenever she desired something more than what she had chosen for herself. [Interestingly, Maura wrote letters to the Generals and talked about her eating-habit. ACMTC still has all that information.]

Contradiction

In all her interviews over the years MS tells the media that she was LOCKED UP for 10 weeks/6 months. But here on p.5 she writes: “…my husband (not the mean O Generals!) ordered me to pack a few belongings, & told me I was moving out to the Chop Shop, which is a cold metal building with concrete floors…” This CS had 2 phone lines & a door that opened up to the alley way, locked from the inside. She could have left, Forgive me, ESCAPED anytime or called the police. She tells the court, “It has a small bathroom with a toilet & sink with only cold water”. If my mind serves me well, it had hot water & had a nice new stove in it. Other times she tells the media she slept on the cold concrete floor – pitiful in deed! She had a bunk bed – Army style. She tells the media that she was FORCED to live in a tiny shed, no water, no heat, no light, door LOCKED for 10 weeks; other times she says 6 months.

On p.5 she writes: “I was required (she tells the media, “I was FORCED!”) to live in the Chop Shop for approx. one month. The bathroom became my only bathing facility for 6 months”. She tells the media that she never bathed or went to the bathroom for 6 months! Yep! 6 months! (See our Px2 Files for all the interviews).

Another LIE

She has told the media over & over that she was LOCKED UP in a dark shed, no water, no lights, no heat, no bathroom. She implies that she NEVER got out until she (somehow!!!???) ESCAPED. In fact one TV doc was titled “I ESCAPED A CULT”.

But on here on p.5 she tells the court, “During the first 2 weeks I was ORDERED (my emph.) by Lila Green to clean barracks #1 & #2 on my hands & knees, along with sweeping sidewalks & scrubbing porches”. Tisk, tisk! She had to do a bit of work. Well, we all worked. I kept the 4 homes clean & neat, including the yards. She asked for work. She was never ORDERED to work.

“MENIAL WORK” DROVE MAURA BERSERK

The Biggs News Butte County Reporter, May 7, 1989, also cited that Maura was “forced to…do menial work at the group’s Sacramento compound.” Without question, Maura was not forced to work at Headquarters, just like she was not forced to stay with the ministry, but she did choose to live and work at ACMTC Headquarters. And let it be known that everyone, including the Generals, worked “menial” jobs at the ministry’s Headquarters! Is it now a crime to work? It is reported that Maura did not even like taking care of her own children but often gave her kids to the Generals for caretaking, Later, of course, Maura accused the Generals of “stealing” her kids – another ridiculous allegation. Considering the situation, the Generals allowed Maura to live at Headquarters for a long time. They sincerely wanted to help Maura as much as they were able. However, it became obvious that Maura did not want to change or amend her family relationships. Eventually, the Generals were left with no other recourse but to ask Maura to leave ACMTC. Soon after that, Maura launched her hateful vendetta against the Generals and ACMTC.

More Contradictions

On p.6 MS writes: “During the first week of this ordeal I was told by my husband that I could attend meetings…” She told the media for years that she was LOCKED up in a tiny shed, no communion with anyone in camp, even her kids. She goes on to say that “Lila Green (told) the group that the other day in service she kept smelling a smell that smelled like a dead animal, & she turned around & saw that it was Forsaken…” Yeah, right. MS makes all kinds of statements with zero evidence – not recorded, not written, not heard by anyone else. She says things & expects us all to believe them just because she says them. That’s not all: “She (Lila) screamed in a frenzied voice, ‘If Forsaken doesn’t shape-up, she can leave’!” But how? She MS, was Locked in a tiny dark shed with no escape!!!

Remember the Concrete Floor Saga?

MS continues on p.6: “The Chop Shop was…very cold”. Pardon me MS, it had a stove. Remember? She continues: “To sleep was almost impossible – the concrete floors were very hard & cold”, implying she was forced to sleep on them.

Page 7

Here MS states, “After I was banned from going into the houses…” What? But, but I thought you told all who would listen, you were LOCKED UP in a tiny shed like an animal!!

Thus Far…

RESTATING SOME FACTS

1. Maura was demoted form her position in ACMTC on account of her unfaithfulness and unwillingness to amend her ways.

2. Maura’s husband was the one who put her out of his home because he did not want to live with an unfaithful wife.

3. Maura chose, by her own will, to live in the Chop Shop and then the two-story clubhouse.

4. Maura liven in the two-story clubhouse – the infamous “shed” – for only a short time. The two-story clubhouse was nothing like Maura’s exaggerated claims. It was 8-by-12 foot, two stories, had a 4-by-4 foot extension on one side and a 4-by-6 foot extension on the other side, was fully carpeted, had a window, a wood stove, and was powered with electricity.

5. Maura had a roommate in the two-story clubhouse named Jacque Rankin. No reporter has ever asked Jacque what really happened.

6. Maura was employed at the Art Shops during the time that she was allegedly “in captivity.” She was fully paid for her work.

7. Maura’s lawsuit implies physical while the testimony of her counselor reveals that she was “never held physically captive.”

CONCLUSION: Based upon the evidence, Maura Schmierer’s stories must be HORRIBLE LIES.

Part Two

Remember MS telling the court that the Chop Shop was cold?, only cold water, no hot water? On p.7 she writes: “my shoes & feet were always wet…I thought that I had a hiding place in the hot water heater room…” Yep! The CS had a hot water heater.

Another “Order”!

She continues (p.7): “Approximately 10 days after I was ORDERED (my emph.) to move into the Chop Shop, another woman Jaque Johnson was ousted & ORDERED (my emph) into the CS with me…” In her media interviews MS does not mention JJ or LD. She implies that she and she alone was LOCKED UP! When this document was made public to us, Robert Blasier’s Secretary came to me & told me that this doc was full of “black holes”. After reading it I knew what she meant. MS goes on to tell the court that we FORCED her to sign some papers. More “papers” were about their French Gulch Property in which she was to give up her share to FLM. This is a lie! Lt. Col. Philip (aka Steve Schmierer) & Capt. Maura both, together, gave their property over to Free Love Ministries, not to Deborah & me. She, again uses the word “ordered” (p.8): “…I did everything ordered…” She signed the papers. We cover all this in our PX2 Files/PX2 Trilogy.

On p.8 she talks about the life in the shed. In this doc she actually tells the truth: “…It had been built as a ‘clubhouse’”. In her interviews with the media she never calls it a “clubhouse” but a tiny, windowless shed, stinking horribly like mildew, wet…sounds pathetic! Yep! Meant to!

There are dozens of newspapers & TV/Docs that speak about the “shed”. The following page is taken from our PX2 Files Trilogy #2, page17:

NEW PROPAGANDA AGAINST ACMTC!!!

NOW NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC has joined forces with the enemies to SLANDER and ACCUSE ACMTC-but, folks, IT’S GETTING A LITTLE OLD, HERE: They’re beating the same “SHED STORY” horse they’ve been beating for about 25 YEARS NOW!!! It’s a new show…but it’s the same old STUPID SELF-PITY SOB STORY OF AN EMBITTERED, BACKSLID WOMAN (WHO’S NOW GONE FROM CHRISTIANITY TO BUDDHISM!) WHO CAN’T SEEM TO GET ENOUGH FAME FOR HERSELF…ALTHOUGH…THIS TIME IT’S ALL BACKFIRING!!!

THE GAME IS UP! GOD’S EXPOSING the LIES! THE ACCUSERS ARE NOW BEING ACCUSED!

On National Geographic’s website, they posted the following descriptions for their “documentary”-that is, for their BIASED, ONE-SIDED AND PITIFULLY CONTRADICTORY “shed story”-under the title, “I Escaped A Cult” (also called: “Banished to the Shed”); our comments below are in brackets “[]”:

“Find out what life inside a cult is really like from individuals who drank the Kool-Aid, living and practicing the beliefs of a radical organization. Brent and Maura tell their emotional stories. [Note the word ’emotional’! NOT ‘FACTUAL!! Just for your information, Brent is said to be the escapee from a polygamist Fundamentalist Mormon sect, and Maura is the ‘shed lady,’ otherwise known as the ‘peanut butter princess,’ who’s sought FORTUNE and FAME by LYING against ACMTC for a quarter of a century now.]”

“Jim and Lila Green FORCE a member of their cult TO LIVE IN A SHED IN THE BACKYARD OF THEIR COMPOUND. comments, related links, and more” (emph. added).

The first airing of the show was at 10pm on April 10, 2012. Interestingly, a couple days after the first airing, there was only one comment posted in regards to the show. The comment, written by one Sally Ducker (at 6:52 PM on April 12, 2012) reads:

“Hi, the one thing as a woman I see is Maura is jealous and so is her daughter, Deb. Lila Green is obviously a woman of strength, the other two are money hungry liars. Maura looks like she is on pain meds, does she have cancer or what? not the same as what she said on Dr. Phil, I think Tom Briggs on youtube has a better take of the shed story, how did she escape when she said she left under their instructions? Seems like she is hiding something could it be the truth?

She said on Dr. Phil she was locked up in shed for six months, no water, no bath, no bathroom, no kids. then her daughter says that she saw her mother in yard, painting house, doing laundry, chopping wood, taking bath in yard? Phony, slanderous, ridiculous and cheap, trashy antiquated journalism very biased.”

The second airing of the show took place on April 15th. Yet another DUD.

As I said before, IT’S ALL BACKFIRING!!! The day before this National Geographic FLOP first aired, another documentary made its debut on the WEB- TELLING “THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY”!!! Tom Briggs, on YOUTUBE, put together his own POWERFUL, ANOINTED and SATIRICAL documentary SERIES that completely contrasts (in a MUCH MORE interesting and captivating way!) the LIES spewed forth by the bitter Buddhist.

YOU SHOULDN’T MISS OUT ON THESE VIDEOS!

Type the link below into your browser to go straight to his YOUTUBE channel, and then click on each video in the series.

https://www.youtube.com/@ThePx2Files/playlists

And I shouldn’t forget to note that in recent years, Maura Schmierer has employed (LITERALLY?!) her daughter, Rebekah, to join in on the LYING adventure. Rebekah’s made a few appearances on TV, including this recent National Geographic disaster-of-a-show, surely hoping for a little bit of that “fame and fortune” pie that “Momma Maura” has been scarfing down for 25 years now. BUT…OH, NO! The fame just turns to SHAME when you watch those “Px2” videos by Tom Briggs!

So once again, we have the media (this time, National Geographic) doing their infamous “one- sided story” bit-with information about as STALE as a 6-month-old, thin peanut butter sandwich. By the way, National Geographic never did contact us or ask us ANYTHING about the allegations cried out by Maura and daughter.

MS continues on p.8: “Several times (Lt.) Bernard Bandaras ORDERED us to remained ‘confined’ to our quarters…Although we were allowed to use the toilet in the Chop Shop…” Other times she tells the media that she was LOCKED UP in a tiny shed, no water, no bathroom…for 6 months.

She continues on p.9: “Bandaras would always (here in this doc she crosses out the word “always”, inserting the word “usually”) beat on the door… ‘time to go to work!!!” But she tells the media she never left the shed for 10 weeks or 6 months.

She continues: “We were treated like criminals. We were literally called ‘prisoners’…” Does she have any proof of this?

She goes on pp.9 & 10 talking about her “work” details. Again, on p.10 she uses the word “ordered”. Hey! Maura, why didn’t you just leave? Since you worked outside you could have flagged down a cop, seeing there were state police all around our H.Q. all the time. Why not get rescued? Why not have all of us arrested? Not ONE police report! Not ONE medical report! Not ONE!!! All made up stories.

Brainwashing?

Oh, yeah! This “B” word gets attention. In PX2 Files Trilogy #2 I have p.43 for your consideration:

COMMONLY REPEATED LIES

Lie #1 – ACMTC leaders practice “brainwashing.”

TRUTH – Please define “brainwashing”, folks! If you are denoting the Generals as cruel Communists, you are horribly deceived and have believed a lie. The Generals help people to think on whatsoever is “true… honest… just… pure… lovely… of good report… [of] virtue… [of] praise” (Philippians 4:8). This is Biblical. Christians are commanded to “THINK on these things,” and Christian leaders are commanded to admonish everyone in such sound doctrine (Titus 2:1; II Timothy 4:1-2 ff.).

Those who slander the Generals are usually avid TV watchers. If there has been any medium by which the masses in this nation have been “brainwashed” to believe certain philosophies, it has been the medium of television [now it’s the medium of the INTERNET!!!]. Food companies spend fortunes on advertising, trying to “brainwash” people to buy their products. Why don’t the accusers slander all advertising companies?

Accusations about “brainwashing” are merely attempts to discredit the Generals and ACMTC without any factual evidence. It’s all unsubstantiated hype. This hype surrounding the idea of “brainwashing” makes for a good melodrama, but it does not hold together under reasonable scrutiny.

Lie #2 – ACMTC practices kidnapping and abusing children.

TRUTH – Another quote from the afore- mentioned Gridley-Biggs-Richvale Ministerial Association answers this allegation well. Against the above charge, the ministers said, “Please folks, don’t get them [ACMTC] mixed up with other groups that we have heard of.” Amen and amen!

While in Sacramento, ACMTC was twice visited by Child Protection Agency (CPA) workers, who had come to address the above allegations, especially child abuse and neglect. The CPA workers determined the allegations were absolutely false and NO ONE FILED CHARGES.

Consider also the following quote from Sergeant William Elliot of the Butte County Sheriff’s department. This quote was cited in the May 3, 1989 issue of The Gridley Herald: “…the Sheriff’s department sees the ACMTC ‘as just another religious group’… involved in ‘no criminal activity that know of.”” Gridley Mayor Thomas E. Campton said the same thing: “I haven’t seen them do anything wrong” (quoted in The Sacramento Bee, Sunday, May 7, 1989). Now why do people not pay attention to verified statements like that? Think, if the above allegations were true, would not ACMTC have been shut down long ago? Kidnapping and child abuse are criminal charges. The Generals would already have been locked up if the accusers had even one minuscule shred of evidence to support their claims.

The early Christian communities of the first, second, and third centuries were faced with the exact same accusations concerning children, so these false allegations are nothing new.

Ordered

Just what does MS mean by “ordered”? She also uses the word “ousted”. They are not the same.

Ordered/Ousted: Look both of these words up in the Eng. Dictionary.

So far she uses the words “order”/“ordered” 21 times, pp.4-10; the word “ousted” is mentioned once, p.2; once p.3; once p.6; once p.7; once p.8.

Part Three

On page 11 she writes, “For the 2½ months we were FORCED (my emph.) to live in the shed. We were only given 6 stale white bread (skimpy) peanut butter sandwiches per day – NOTHING ELSE!” This Big Lie has been told & retold dozens of times. Sarah told the Guardian (April 2026) “…So when they (me & Deborah) LOCKED the people the shed, I’d sneak them food. I just didn’t understand why Maura…all of a sudden was being FORCED (my emph.) to live like an animal & do the most degrading things”. Well, that statement contradicts Maura’s “we were only given 6 stale white bread peanut butter sandwiches per day – NOTHING ELSE!” So, what food did Sarah slip into that LOCKED, NO WINDOWS tiny shed? “Locked” implies we had the key, not Sarah. And that statement “forced to live like an animal came directly from one reported (see our PX2 Files Trilogy). The following quotes are taken from PX2 Files, #1, pp.23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, & 33:

DIRTY LITTLE SECRETS

DOUBLE P (Px2 FILES – Persecution x Prosecution)

DOCUMENTARY

Note: My words in the quotes are contained in brackets [ ], and my initials “GJ” come before my comments/replies.

FIRST ARTICLE

– article written by Dale Vargas (DV), with quotes from Maura Schmierer (MS) –

DV: “A 39-year-old Sacramento woman is suing FLM [Free Love Ministries, former name of ACMTC] claiming the unorthodox Christian group held her captive for 6 months last year…”

“[Maura Schmierer], who had been a member of the group [a Captain] since 1982, was [notice the word following] virtually imprisoned last January…”

“[Maura Schmierer] said she was forced for the next 6 months to live in tiny quarters [a single place or different places?] and do menial work at the groups compound.”

GJ: The above statement is really vague. Did she live in a single place, or different places? It sounds like she is implying that she lived in the shed (“tiny quarters”) for 6 months. (Actually, the so-called tiny “shed” was really a two-story clubhouse-a “T”-shaped building that was 8×12 ft. with two extensions: one 4×4 ft. extension with a window; one 4×6 ft. extension with a wood stove; it was fully carpeted, had electricity, and good lighting.) But how can one be “virtually” locked up and yet do work outside the “tiny quarters”? Was she really “imprisoned” as she claimed?

DV: “During that time, her diet consisted of small, stale peanut butter sandwiches, she said during the interview in her attorney’s office. For 6 months, she said, she was not allowed to bathe or have any hot water. Frequently she did not have access to a bathroom.” [Again, this sounds like she is implying 6 months in the “shed”.]

GJ: On the Dr. Phil TV Show, Phil McGraw comes on and says, “… Maura says her worst punishment was being locked in a windowless shed for 10 weeks with only stale peanut butter sandwiches.”

MS (on the Phil Show): “I was not allowed to see or talk to my children for SIX MONTHS [remember this statement]. There was a shed in the backyard. I was ordered to move into that shed. There were no windows in the shed and it was full of mildew and you couldn’t stand upright. NO BATHROOM or shower for SIX MONTHS [remember this].” [She was in the so-called “shed” for 6 months?]

Towards the end of the TV show:

MS: “…they put me out in the shed…the door was NOT LOCKED. I COULD HAVE LEFT…”

Back to the Sacramento Bee newspaper:

MS: “I was afraid to walk away.”

GJ: What? Maura was virtually locked up for 6 months (by implication and vagueness, in the “shed” the whole time), and she says she could have walked away?

DV: “[Maura Schmierer] spent PART OF HER TIME in a 5×12 ft. shed…At times, other women also spent time in the shed…”

SECOND ARTICLE

HEADLINE: “Mother of 3 sues cult-tells of life in shed” (Sacramento Union newspaper, March 16, 1988 issue)

article by Trinda Pasquet (TP), reporter, with quotes from Maura Schmierer (MS) –

TP: “The mother of 3 said she was removed from her family and forced [note that word “FORCED”!] to live in ‘intolerable conditions’ for the following SIX MONTHS.”

“…the organization…moved her into a workshop…”

GJ: True about her being in the workshop. It was the very newly built workshop that had a restroom, running water, a phone, and the doors locked from the inside. It was a spacious, new 30×40 ft. workshop-she had very large living quarters! This is the very shop she never dared to mention on the Dr. Phil Show. Why? The papers said she stayed in the workshop, cause Mrs. peanut-butter princess told the reporter it was so, so why the silence about it now?

TP: “…she [Maura Schmierer] was moved into a 5×12 ft. wooden shed [actually, as said above, it was really a two-story clubhouse-a “T”-shaped building that was 8×12 ft. with two extensions: one 4×4 ft. extension with a window; one 4×6 ft. extension with a wood stove; it was fully carpeted, had electricity, and good lighting]… The woman [Maura Schmierer] said she and another banished member [Capt. Rachel Johnson] shared the damp shed without toilet facilities or windows.”

GJ: On the TV show, Maura makes her audience believe that she NEVER bathed (hold your noses, folks!), NEVER went to the toilet (wow!) and NEVER saw any of her children for 6 months.

TP: “During the 10 WEEKS [or was it 6 months, Maura?] she spent there, she was fed an average of 6 small, stale peanut butter sandwiches every day.”

GJ: She never tells us that her and her son ate in the kitchen/dining room-all they wanted to eat!!

TP: “In March 1987, the suit said [Maura Schmierer] and 2 other female members were advised at a meeting that their husbands were divorcing them for ‘spiritual adultery’ [ha!]. The 3 women were then allegedly ordered back to the shed, where they remained for about 5 days [5 days?].”

Note the next quote:

TP: “One of the 3 women reportedly left the compound and Sacramento police were phoned…”

GJ: True, in one sense. The one who left (a black girl) did use our camp phone to call the police-but not because she was held captive. Did we or did we not LOCK these ladies up? If we did, how did this one escape? This “escapee” actually spent only 5 days/nights in the fully carpeted, powered, well lit, heated two-story clubhouse AT HER OWN DOINGS, then left. The police did come, looked at the two-story clubhouse, found NOTHING wrong (not even with the 2 other “prisoners”!), and left. NO report was made, no arrests, NOTHING!

Why didn’t Maura call or ask for help? Two officers were right there! In fact, why didn’t Maura ever make out a police, medical, or psychiatric report to have PROOF of all her sad tales in the “shed”? Why not have us arrested? Why not?

TP: “[Maura Schmierer] said she spent the next 3 weeks in a basement and then moved into a bedroom for 6 weeks.”

GJ: Well now, isn’t this just fine! What about her story that we held her “captive” for 6 months, or 10 weeks, with no toilet, no hot water, blah, blah, blah?

Just as I told the reporters back then: she was NOT held against her will. To hear her tell it on the TV show, she held her bowels for 6 months and never bathed. Her lies get BIGGER!! And she intentionally speaks vaguely. She said she never saw her kids for 6 months also. Really, Maura?

TP: Note the following quote: “[Maura Schmierer’s] 5-year-old son…moved…into [Maura Schmierer’s] bedroom…”

GJ: We allegedly ordered the move.

Yes, dear readers, she saw her kids! (But how could she, if she implies to have been locked up for 6 months and didn’t even have a window in that dirty, wet ol’ wooden shed? Oh, maybe she peeked thru the cracks!) Her son did live with her in several locations in our camp. Don’t you remember, Maura?

Last comment in the paper:

TP: “Jim Green, Brigadier General, finally ordered [Maura Schmierer] to leave the compound in July 1987…”

GJ: True enough. I got sick of this lady acting so stupid and playing “held captive.”

***

Now, dear readers, is this CONFUSION and intentional vagueness? And she has carried on with this “20 million dollar LIE” for 24 years now. I have dozens of newspaper clips that contradict over and over her own reports. And they (our enemies) still think we did all that stuff to this poor ol’ pathetic liar!

Doesn’t she even know what “story” she told whom? Why can’t she just speak plainly about her story? This is just the “shed” story, not to mention her other extra deeds and sayings.

“Food for Thought”

MANY TIMES Maura Schmierer claims she was fed 6 stale peanut butter sandwiches a day for 10 weeks, no water was mentioned for drinking. This would add up to 420 sandwiches.

In other places, Maura seems to claim that she was fed 6 stale peanut butter sandwiches a day for 6 months, no drinking water being mentioned. This would add up to 1098 sandwiches (with 30- and 31- day months alternating). Not bad! At times she says she had only minimal access to a toilet, and in some places she seems to imply that she had no access to a toilet. In either case, I guess she must have released her bowels (at least somewhat) in the corner of that dirty ol’ dark shed, or she MUST have held her bowels for, perhaps, the entire 10 weeks? or even 6 months?! If this is the case-that she held her bowels-she ought to be in the Guinness Book of World Records for holding in either 420 or 1098 peanut butter sandwiches without having to go to the bathroom!!

Maura doesn’t mention what the other ladies ate. Capt. Rachel Johnson stayed the entire duration in the “shed” with Maura…and what did she eat? Maura never tells us. Let us just guess-she ate the same number of sandwiches as Maura. If this was true, then both of them together consumed 840 sandwiches in 10 weeks, or for 6 months it would be 2196 peanut butter sandwiches-with no drinking water mentioned. Let us say that they did release. their bowels in the shed’s corner…

Weigh the Evidence

Quote from the Dr. Phil Show Sept. 21, 2006 (Opening Sequence)

The following is a series of quotes taken from various newspaper articles written in the late 1980’s as well as some quotes from the Sept. 21, 2006 Dr. Phil Show, along with my comments. Note: My initials (GJ) come before my comments..

– General Jim

[Note: In some quotes, “bold-faced type”, “italics”, “underline” and/or “all caps” have been added for emphasis.]

“ACMTC Ministry Comes To Gridley” Chico Enterprise-Record (California) Reporter: Ed Farrell (EF) May 4, 1989

EF: “The plaintiff [Maura Schmierer] complained of brainwashing and harsh treatment, claiming she was punished by the group by being FORCED to live in an unheated, unlighted shed on a diet of peanut butter sandwiches.”

MS: “What they practice there is mind control. Pure and simple brainwashing. They use God’s name for evil purposes and they subvert people’s minds. And when you subvert someone’s mind, it’s like RAPING their soul.”

GJ: If Maura was really brainwashed by us, who evaluated this? A psychiatrist? A doctor? Did Maura seek to get “deprogrammed”? NO! Not ONE report of this ever being done. If she was really that brainwashed, when did she get her rightful mind back? Apparently after she sued us for 20 million dollars-that did the job!

EF: “The building [‘shed’] had no electricity or plumbing…”

GJ: It had electric power but no plumbing. It was a clubhouse. But right next door (literally butting right up to an extension on the clubhouse) was a brand new 30×40 ft. building that had power, a restroom, wood and electric heat, and a phone-all for Maura to use anytime. She even lived in this new building for a period of time.

EF: “…[Maura Schmierer] spent her time ‘in judgment’ deep in prayer, seeking forgiveness and guidance from God. Only the DEPLORABLE conditions and NEAR STARVATION forced her to leave the compound, according to her attorney, Bob Blasier of Sacramento.”

GJ: Deep prayer? Forgiveness? What kind of talk is this? Deplorable conditions? Our camp was clean, beautiful and up to city code! Ask the city officials.

EF: “It was only after an INTENSE ‘de-programming’ session that [Maura] contacted Blasier.”

GJ: Intense “de-programming”? By whom, when, where, how? Get serious, she was never “brainwashed” nor “held captive”-these were made up to sue us, pure and simple!

EF: “On the surface, the Greens are very articulate, very neat people who don’t come across at all like crazies. But underneath the surface, in my opinion, they’re COMPULSIVE, CONFIRMED LIARS, Blasier said.”

GJ: Tell me, Mr. Blasier, who is telling the lies? Read Maura’s own words for yourself. And if we are very “neat” people, why would we have a camp that is DEPLORABLE, dirty, dingy, etc.?

EF: “According to Blasier, SEVERE corporal punishment of the group’s children could be classified as child abuse, but sexual promiscuity or abuse is not practiced or tolerated by the ministry.”

GJ: What child abuse, Mr. Blasier? Tell me, please. Where is any record of this so one can get confirmation? NONE! The Dr. Phil Show was sickening when both Maura and her daughter said we told them to BEAT their babies. Maybe they did, but not because we told them to. However, we do correct children according to the Biblical standard.

EF: “’That [reference to severe punishment of children] is merely another lie,’ said Green. ‘Mr Blasier has been after us for years [to find something, anything on us; after all, he is a criminal lawyer, not a civil one].’”

-comment in the article by Brig. General Deborah (GD): –

GD: “We’ve been inspected on several occasions by the authorities, including Child Protective Services, and we’ve never been found lacking in proper care for the children here. In fact, we’ve ALWAYS been complimented about the neatness of our facility.”

GJ: Tell me, Maura, why didn’t you ever call the police on us for child abuse? And you, daughter of Maura, why have you waited 19 years now to accuse us of ordering you to beat your baby? Neither you nor your mother ever said a word about this back then to any reporters or officials. Surely, Maura, if we had done all this CRUEL child abuse, you would have let the reporters know. Remember, you LOVE to “expose” us!!

Taken from the Dr. Phil Show Sept. 21, 2006

MS: “I was instructed to whip my 6-month-old son with a belt on his bare bottom…”

MS’s daughter: “I whipped my son because I was instructed to. I was afraid of Deborah Green. I did it because I was told to, and I knew it wasn’t right. Innocent little baby gets beat!”

GJ: Now isn’t this pathetic-the Generals TOLD ME TO DO IT! Passing the buck. I guess I also would call this being “brainwashed” if I would have heard this. “They made me do it.” Wow! Why have you dear ladies waited so many years to tell this? Oh, forgive me, you are AFRAID of my wife. You are Christian and you’re still controlled by fear??

[NOTE: Maura is now a practicing BUDDHIST and a WINE BIBBER!!!.]

“Religious Sect Moves To Biggs” Mercury-Register

Reporter: Rick Longly (RL)

RL: “The Greens…flatly denied published allegations by one-time member [Maura Schmierer] that she was abused by the group and forced to live in unsanitary conditions for a time at the ministry’s Sacramento complex.”

“The Greens said the building [Maura Schmierer] allegedly lived in was clean and [Maura] had moved into it after divorcing her husband who lived elsewhere in the compound.”

“Gridley ‘Cult’ Denies Charges” Yuba-Sutter Appeal Democrat Reporter: Gordon Sullivan (GS) May 6, 1989

GS: “After the divorce, Deborah Green said, she wanted [Maura] to leave the Sacramento compound but allowed her to stay in a children’s ‘playhouse’ there with electricity, a stove and carpeting because ‘she begged me’.”

GJ: Maura literally BEGGED my wife to stay in our camp. She said if we did not allow her to stay, she would take her son and live on the streets (around our camp) in a shopping cart. Why hasn’t Maura ever mentioned this? Dozens of members heard her say this, including her daughter who was on the Dr. Phil Show.

Gridley Press Conference

“Aggressive Christian Group Responds To Media Attacks”

Reporter: Charles Gallardo (CG) May 5, 1989

– comment in the article by Brig. General Deborah (GD): –

GD: “There has been a lot of misunderstanding in the media.”

CG: “However, amidst the smoking guns the group’s leadership did not address issues that affect the local residents.’

“The room at the compound north-east of Gridley on Mead Ave was crowded with TV crews and reporters plus some curious neighbors, Gridley Mayor Tom Compton, Councilwoman Suzanne Ingram, Chief of Police John Donnahae, Supervisor Ed McLaughlin, and others.”

“[General] James asserted that Blasier is a covetous lawyer who sought someone for a long time and finally found [Maura Schmierer].”

“The Greens contend Bob Blasier has been after our property for 5 or 6 years.”

GJ: That is no understatement! Maura and Blasier, together, made up the 20 million dollar lie to do away with ALL of us. In fact, several years ago, one of our female officers called his office (in disguise) and asked for the video pack (about the press conference, which he sells!!). He told her that this current lawsuit (which is time-barred by the 14 year statute of limitations for NM) “would finally DESTROY ACMTC!” These are his exact words. You folks can see now how the court in Grants, NM, is horribly biased and bigoted against us. In fact, one man flew down from another state and warned us that they (Bob Blasier and Maura) had “gotten the right judge that would agree with them.” This was his exact statement. Has the judge been bribed? Biased, bigoted, bribed? It does appear to be so!

“Christian Cult Sets Up Camp North of Gridley” Gridley Herald

Reporter: Charles Gallardo (CG)

Wed., May 3, 1989

CG: “According to a March 11, 1989 Sacramento Bee report given the Herald by ACMTC co-leader [Brig. General] Lila [Deborah] Green, the one-time member, [Maura Schmierer], 41, of Sacramento, countered in the suit that she was ‘virtually imprisoned’ in January 1987 after the group’s leaders deemed that she had ‘fallen under God’s judgment’.”

“The Bee report continued, ‘she [Maura] said she was FORCED for the next 6 months to live in tiny quarters [plural?] and do menial work at the group’s compound.’

GJ: Again, Maura held a job out at the Anden Way Art Shop, along with the “other woman” (Rachel Johnson). They both earned their own money, walked the streets of Sacramento, passing out tracts, shopping, coming and going from our city Headquarters. Ask Maura about this. Ask if she did indeed work, get paid, and have taxes taken out of her paycheck. Ask her. Ask her daughter, who rode in our bus to and from the Art Shop.

– comment in the article by Brig. General Jim: – GJ: “The lawsuit was the plot of a lawyer [Blasier] to take away our land.”

GJ: This same lawyer is trying to repeat this same evil plot here in NM as I write this (Nov. 2, 2006).

“Militaristic Sect Comes To Butte County” Butte County Reporter

article by: George Thurlow and Melinda Welsh (T&W) May 4, 1989

T&W: “…A former member [Maura Schmierer] alleged she had been brainwashed, separated from her children and then FORCED to live in a shed ‘LIKE AN ANIMAL’.”

GJ: Folks, this gets better all the time “like an animal”!

T&W: “…sect member was FORCED to move into a 5×10 wooden shed, where she lived for 10 weeks.”

“In a lengthy response to [Maura Schmierer], handed out to reporters at the Biggs ranch, the Greens deny the allegations and allegations and blame [Maura’s] accusations on a nasty custody fight.”

Note this next quote:

“The woman’s daughter [the same one on the Dr. Phil Show with “mom”] also belongs to the group and, according to the Greens, is ‘ashamed’ of her mother’s actions.”

GJ: Everybody from those days knows perfectly well that Maura and her daughter NEVER did get along.

T&W: “The real reason for [Maura’s] problems, the Greens concluded, was SERIOUS MISCONDUCT.”

“Religious Group Responds To Controversy, Concern Over East Biggs Location”

The Biggs News

Reporter: John Hetherington (JH) May 4, 1989

comment in the article by Brig. General Jim: – GJ: “…we have a swinging-door policy here. If you come in [to ACMTC], you can go out. We don’t keep people against their wills.””

GJ: This policy still holds today. WE DO NOT WANT TROUBLEMAKERS OR THOSE WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE HERE! Read my lips!!

“Sacramento’s Army of God” Sacramento News and Reviews

Reporter: Melinda Welsh (MW) 1989

MW: “Army of God’-an elite force of warriors in training for some ultimate combat for the souls of humankind…their Headquarters consisted of 4 middle-class, METICULOUSLY kept communal houses…”

“Pamela Sockolov, an employee at Bill’s Glass across the street, says she’s been watching them [the ministry] move for weeks. ‘I watched them take down the BIG SHED and load what was left into vans.”

GJ: That BIG SHED was the new workshop where Maura lived for a time (sound TINY to you?) and had constant access to a phone, toilet, sink, and space!

MW: “Jim

and Lila [and other other sect members]…brainwashed her, separated her from her children, and FORCED her to live ‘LIKE AN ANIMAL’ for 6 months.”

“Cult-Buster: Bob Blasier”

(taken from the same newspaper above; “BB” stands for “Bob Blasier”)

BB: “I could see how people could be drawn to them [the Generals] at first, though, reflected Blasier. They seem like friendly, articulate people.”

GJ: Yes, and Bob told us he too was Christian. Yet all his actions against us were very UN-Christian.

“Ministry Contends with Violence”

Butte County Reporter Reporter: Jan Held (JH)

May 11, 1989

JH: “The judgment came about when [Maura Schmierer], 41, stated in her suit she was IMPRISONED by the ACMTC in January of 1987 and FORCED to live in a shed and do menial work at the group’s Sacramento compound.”

GJ: Here we go one more time, the pitiful “shed” story.

JH: “Because there was no room in the dormitory-style quarters in which members lived, [Brig. General] Lila Green said, Mrs. [Maura Schmierer] was given the opportunity to remain in the complex to live in a ‘playhouse’ the group had built for children living in the complex. ‘There were utilities in the building and restrooms available,’ the Greens said, adding anyone who had seen the Sacramento complex knows there was NO DILAPIDATED shed on the property. ‘We could have put her out on the street,’ Lila Green said, but we didn’t.”

“Still a member of [the ACMTC], Philip Jordan [now Colonel] validated the Greens’ statements, saying his ex-wife was sexually promiscuous.”

“Gridley Officials Respond to New Christian Group”

The Biggs News

Reporter: Charles Gallardo (CG) May 1989

CG: “Citing the First Amendment and the right of due process, Gridley public officials offered tentative approval, amid skepticism, to the newly arrived [ACMTC] following the group’s press conference last Thursday morning.”

“I am still skeptical, the Mayor said, but would like to gather more facts before I make a decision. Until proven guilty, they are innocent.”

“Gridley Police Chief echoed those [words] of the Mayor, ‘Anybody can make allegations. Unless I have solid evidence, I’m not going to condemn them,’ he said.”

GJ: Thank you, Mayor and Chief. Too bad others don’t follow your advice. Well, folks, we were never “condemned” in that township-they saw thru all the media hype and Maura Schmierer/Bob Blasier BULL!

“Militant Sect Tells Its Story” Superior California – Weekend Reviews

Reporter: Richard Abrams (RA) May 3, 1989

RA: “In an unexpected about-face, ministry members…said the sect had ‘decided to come out of the closet’ to do battle with ‘bigoted hysteria’ that has subjected their ministry to its own depiction of ‘hell’.” Note this next quote: “…to break up [Maura’s] former marriage and BANISH her to a small shed for 6 MONTHS.”

GJ: Mr. Abrams literally stalked us for years, trying to get an interview (his tactics of reporting were not “nice,” so we avoided him). Finally we let him in our one and only press conference.

RA: “They said her [Maura’s] crime was that she loved her husband and children more than God…”

GJ: This has got to be funny! Maura never cared for her kids; that is why she pushed them off on us all the time. Everybody at that time knew this. She was a POOR mother and wife. We were told by two men that she was “available.” It was for this that we had to do something. She denies this, but even a casual reader of what I’ve compiled can see that she LIES!

RA: “Jerry Axtell, [Maura’s pastor,] a senior pastor at New Hope Christian Fellowship, has also counseled [not “de-programmed”!] ex-members, including [Maura Schmierer] and [Lisa Dye-the black girl who “escaped” the ol’ bad Generals!]. The indoctrination ‘happens by degrees-like what happed with Hitler in Germany. [MAURA] WAS NEVER HELD PHYSICALLY CAPTIVE. But…by fear,’ Axtell said.”

GJ: At last! Sorry about that, Maura, but he just had to “tell the truth” (at least about you never being a physical captive) since he was your pastor. Why do you continually tell people the opposite, or at least imply the opposite? Do you LIE? Do you DECEIVE? Well, we’re all waiting out here!

MS: “I was accused of treating my children as idols…”

GJ: Really, Maura? When did you ever care for any of your kids? Never when we knew you.

RA: “It was in fact, [Maura’s] 20-year old daughter who sent a recent letter to local media titled ‘The $20 million lie.’ [Rebekah] accused her mother of a litany of SINS, including CHILD NEGLECT AND CHILD ABUSE.”

GJ: Well now, dear ladies, why have both of you, on the Dr. Phil Show, blamed us now? Did you, Maura, promise your daughter a piece of the lawsuit pie if she would lie? It appears this way. I would never tell my audience what you allowed to happen to your little daughter before joining ACMTC. We have the newspaper report from Placerville, CA, describing that event. Don’t you remember? We do! Child neglect and child abuse is lightly putting it…it was sexually sick!!

RA: “Lt. Col. Phillip Jordan [AKA, Steve Schmierer] last week called his ex-wife’s accusation ‘fantastic lies’. Jordan…said the shed in which his ex-wife claimed to be held captive was actually a children’s playhouse with carpet and electricity. Jordan said he and [Maura] chose to divorce after she became involved in an extramarital affair [which we know to be true!]. He said his ex-wife CHOSE ON HER OWN to move into the clubhouse after we were divorced.”

“Aggressive Christians Face Possible LOSS of Property”

Butte County Reporter

Reporter: Charles Gallardo (CG) 1989

CG: “According to the suit, [Maura] signed over her house, unknowingly gave up legal custody of her 3 minor children and unwittingly agreed to a divorce during her CAPTIVITY.”

GJ: Here we have a woman who “signed over her house.” What house? The small, unfinished and partly furnished (with NO electric, no bath or restroom or running water!) cabin up in the mountains that your husband built? Yes, we went there several times. The same cabin where your kids didn’t eat properly, were not clothed adequately and you and your husband grew dope and used lots of it! If my memory serves me right, my wife and I used to bring you folks food-a 3 hour (one-way) drive. And your poor, sick baby girl, who had pneumonia, after I prayed for her, was healed that very night. Have you forgotten this? Have you also forgotten that it was we who bought your first pair of shoes when you hadn’t had on shoes for literally years? I also showed that receipt to the reporters, but as usual, they failed to report all this to the public. Was it not us who helped you move into a nice home in Sacramento area to live in, after you both wanted to straighten out your hippy lifestyle? And wasn’t it you both who agreed (after you said you heard from God in prayer!) to sell your cabin and donate the $$ to the ministry? To be honest, dear Maura, we never asked a penny out of either one of you-or has your memory failed you? And was it not you, Maura, that used to bring your kids over to our home to get fed, because you didn’t even know how to cook for a family? Have all your kids forgotten this or have you turned them against us because you didn’t want them to stay with God? We have lots of photos of you guys back then in the hills. You had no expensive home that we took.

Oh yes!

I can’t pass up the opportunity to let my readers read the following:

“Soldiers of God’ have NM town abuzz” El Paso Times

Reporter: Dan Williams, (DW) June 25, 1995

DW: “The Greens are intelligent, crafty people who have become adept at controlling others, said Robert Blasier, a Sacramento lawyer. He said he has represented parents of several group members. Today, he is part of the defence team at the O.J. Simpson trial in Las [sic] Angeles, CA.”

GJ: This ought to tell us something about the “Christian” character of Mr. lawyer-defending a brutal murderer as O.J.!

There is a man that is supposed to champion women (such as “abused” Maura!), and here he is defending a wife-killer. Everybody knows that O.J. killed his wife. I’m not saying this, everybody I ever talked to says it! So, Mr. O.J. gets set free-WITH THE HELP OF BLASIER!!

DW: “Deborah Green who went by the name Lila Green in Sacramento, is especially convincing, Blasier said.”

GJ: Why, Mr. lawyer? Because she don’t let people push her around, like you!

DW: “Lila is the real power behind the group,” he said.”

GJ: Sorry, Mr. lawyer, but Christ Jesus is the REAL POWER behind her.

DW (quoting BB): “She’s one of those people you look in the eyes and you feel real strange-a Charlie Manson type.”

Here we go one more time

DW: “…a former member who said she was brainwashed, imprisoned and FORCED to divorce her husband and surrender legal custody of her 4 children.”

“It’s a mental prison. They tore apart my life,’ said [Maura Schmierer] of Sacramento… ‘they told all kinds of lies about me…made my husband think I was a witch.””

GJ: Does the kettle call the pot BLACK? Lies? Lies, Mrs. Schmierer? Really? It is okay for your attorney to call my wife Charles Manson, but don’t say anything about good old you.

DW: “…she was held captive in a 5×12 ft. wooden shed with a low ceiling that prevented her from standing upright.’

“They claimed that God had judged me, so they excommunicated me and put me in a shed in the basement,’ [Maura Schmierer], now 47, said.”

GJ: Shed, in the basement? That’s new, isn’t it?

Now Hear This!

DW: “[Maura]…said she feels intimidated by the group’s ‘generals.’ But, she said Berino [NM] residents shouldn’t consider them a threat to the community.”

GJ: Thanks, Maura, for that “nice” comment. We’re real sorry that you feel so intimidated by us. Maybe you should REPENT of all your lies and get some peace in your troubled life.

One example of an e-mail received from Maura, dated 2/4/03:

“You are being foolish. Hypocrites, liars, snakes! How can you live under the pretense of holiness when you TWIST truth and make up these outlandish, mean-spirited, disgustingly nasty lies? You are perverted, who is your father? My Father has taught me NOT TO LIE. From whose garden do you pick your fruit: sorcery, hatred, contentions, outbursts of wrath, dissension, heresies…?

Thank God for His Word which is a lamp to my feet. Otherwise, with all the mud you’ve flung my way, I’d be in the nuthouse for sure. And thank you for re-energizing my vigor to fight deception and to stand victorious on Truth’s ground…paradoxically, lies can reveal truth too.”

GJ: You said it, Maura. This is why I want my readers to see the profile of one who is steeped in lies. Produce evidence of our “mud flinging” if you will. I’ve just quoted many (not all) of YOUR quotes, not someone else’s.

[NOTE: SHE HAS NEVER PRODUCED ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE!!]

She ended with this:

“And you know…the more lies you tell, the more transparent you become.”

Part Four

On page 11 MS continues: “…I would get so hungry from working so hard that I resorted to eating out of the camp’s garbage cans.” Yep! Sounds CULTISH enough! Starve your “victims!” This surely will get the court to grant her $20 million dollars!!! She further states, “I went from a size 10 to a size 5 skirt in 3 months time”. Well now, what about that white sack dress you wore all those months?…being locked up in a shed on a starvation diet. When did you change dresses?, and how? Oh, I get it, “we had to get permission to leave camp…” (p.11). And “for 4 months Jaque & I had a total of $20 for spending money”. It was a fact that you also worked at the Art Shop, earned a salary like all the other others, hence, you could have bought a new dress. Poor Maura, so deprived: “I used to collect rags because I had no money to buy feminine napkins” (p.11). But collecting rags would be an impossible since you told the media you were LOCKED UP in a tiny shed for 10 weeks/6 months.

No Talking Please!

She continues: “For 6 months from from Jan. to July with few exceptions I was not allowed to talk to anybody & nobody, including my children…except to give me work orders. It was like being in solitary confinement!” Wow! You’ve told the sad tale for years that you were LOCKED in SC! And, did you ever talk to your cell-mate, Jaque? Give us a break!!! We don’t buy your “tall tale of terror”.

She Rambles On & On

On p.2 MS writes about “forced divorces”, which is another BIG LIE! She said, “I was dumbfounded. I tried calling Gen. Lila on the Chop Shop telephone…” Oh, my, a telephone? Yup! Actually we had two phones. May we now ask WHY didn’t MS call for help? If we actually was holding her against her will, she could have called the police.

Lisa Dye

The Oracle’s Daughter mentions LD. She also was having marriage problems & decided to join MS & JJ in the shed. No one “ordered” it done! At least Dye used the phone & called the police – they come, found no crime scene & they escorted Dye out of the camp. Maura thought she had a good marriage (yeah right, a little adultery wouldn’t hurt!!!) Even her oldest daughter said her marriage was terrible. She wrote a long article that describes her mother’s actions (see PX2 Files Trilogy #3, pp6-9 called “20 Million Dollar Lie Exposed”, notarized April 25, 1989). She fills us in on what MS was really like.

“Ordered” cont.

MS continues to use the “O” word; p.10 = 3 times; p.11 = “orders”, once; “forced” = once; p.13 = once; p.14 = “ordered” 3 times; p.15 “ordered” = 1 time; p.16 = “forbidden” = once; p.19 = “ordered”, = twice; p.22 = “ordered”, once.

One can see that MS purposely uses “ordered” to fit her narrative of being a “prisoner of ACMTC/THE Generals. I’m sure her crafty attorney coached her on what to say and how to ELICIT pity from the court and from the public. After all, Robert was gonna make a killing (fig.) off us thru his/her crafted law suit. I’m sure he got most of the settlement.

There are 20 definitions given in the New World Dictionary of American English for “order”/“ordered”. Number 10 is the one that is used in MS legal declaration proceeding: “A command, direction, or instruction, usually backed up by authority”. In strictly legal terms, “order”/“orders”/“ordered” (#18) in ref. to law, a direction or command of a court, judge, public body, etc. In ref. to religion e.g. Holy Orders, = to instruct to do something; give an order; command.

The way MS uses is as follows: “I was ordered not to attend prayer” (p.4); “and ordered to turn in all uniforms” (p.4); “They ordered members to treat me” (p.4); “I was ordered by my husband to” (p.5); “my husband ordered me to pack” (p.5); “I was ordered by Lila Green to” (p.5); “I was ordered to stay away from” (p.5); “She ordered the group to have no” (p.6); “I was ordered to wear a white dress” (p.7); “I was ordered to move into the” (p.7); “and ordered into the Chop Shop” (p.7); “being ordered to move into the shed…” (p.7); “my husband ordered me into his house” (p.7); “I did everything ordered” (p.8); “very coldly ordered us to clean the” (p.8); “and ordered us to move into” (p.8); “Bandaras ordered us to remain” (p.8); “my husband passed orders down” (p.9); “we were ordered to wash houses” (p.10); “we were ordered to haul in the dirt” (p.10); “we were ordered by Lt. Bandaras” (p.10); “we were forced to live in the shed” (p.11); “give me work orders” (p.11); “we were ordered to get our” (p.13); “we were then ordered to pull” (p.14); “we were ordered to cut” (p.14); “I was ordered by Bandaras to get” (p.14); “The Generals ordered us into their” (p.15); “David Gane then ordered me to” (p.19); “Jim Green ordered me to leave the compound” (p.19); “how can I describe the agony of being ordered” (p.22).

There you have a perfect profile of not only a serial “liar” but a “victim” of a cruel cult!!!

There is no reason to continue with “she said”, “they said” stuff. My point in all this is to show you that many of the things she wrote in her declaration is the opposite of what she told the media. Her “they locked me up!” lie is just that, a LIE! She chose to remain at Ft. Freedom. True, we had to deal with her marriage problems, her children, her husband. But she brought all this upon her own head by her sexual promiscuity.

Settling the Record Straight

MS brings into the “pity me” saga Jaque Johnson (aka Captain Rachel Johnson). We should hear what she had to say about all this “ordered” BS! Her long article is posted at AC.net, front page under “check out these very informative articles: (1) “Weigh the Evidence!” where I cite news reports, a must read!; (2) “Setting the Record Straight”; (3) “The Other Side of the Story”, by Gen. Jim & ACMTC Staff – a must read also.

But back to “Setting the Record Straight.” She writes: “the truth is that we were NOT IMPRISONED. No, not at all. Because the two of us were disruptive influences in the community, it was rather more that everyone hoped we would leave. We were FREE to come & go…we both worked jobs outside camp…” Please read the whole article. Of all the interviews over the years, not a single report has brought up Captain Johnson. Not one reporter asked if MS genre was true. NOT One! Well, after reading her article you’ll see why. She BLOWS the WHOLE DAMN story to HELL!!!

What is Missing???

What is missing from the declaration of MS? CHILD ABUSE!!! Yep! Not a word. The only mention of any child is Stephen. She bemoans the fact that Stephen, her youngest son, “apparently Stephen had become a behavior problem for the Generals during the period of my CONFINEMENT (my emph.)”. (P.16). From p.16 – p.25 she writes about her children, as if we were holding them “captive” as well.

She writes on p.20: “Jim Green told my attorney’s secretary that I was a whore & a drug addict. This was in front of my children”. This did not happen. She makes up things to get public pity. On p.21 MS lists 17 things Nathaniel did (?) in 3 weeks; she blamed us of course. Of course!

You would think if any child abuse took place during the years MS was with us, this would be her “golden opportunity” to write about it. But not a single mention. But after she left & began to get pity for her “tall tales of terror”, she & her backslidden daughter began to tell the media/public how we ABUSED children, even their own!

In The Oracle’s Daughter (Notes), chapter 13, Hill writes under “a Grand Guignol of suffering”: Jim writes, “No physical abuse of any kind took place, MS. All tales of abuse only took place in your mind – in a lie!” That statement was in ref. to MS, not children. Even Hill, arch enemy of us, quotes from “Setting the Record Straight” (Notes, p.298). However, Hill says “Lisa Dye’s written testimony, however, generally corroborates Maura’s account”. Naturally! But LD spent only 3 days in the children’s club house as opposed to Jacque who spent many weeks with Maura. So, tell me, which person would you believe, Jacque or Lisa?

I’ll give credit to Hill (Notes) for at least hinting that our testimony against Maura’s BIG LIES is in print (see p.298).

And Hill also writes (Notes) about Maura’s sex problems: Maura says that she was “judged” for “spiritual adultery”, not physical adultery, Hill writes: “For decades Deborah & Jim Green have said Maura was guilty of rampant sexual misconduct with a member of the group, a charge Maura denies”. This statement is not totally correct. We never used the word “rampant”.

We’ve always maintained that 2 men confessed to having sex with Maura – only two. One was a member of ACMTC, the other was not. I never asked how many times they had sex with her; they never told me either.

Hill writes about MS as though she actually was abused by us. He goes beyond MS & writes: “…ACMTC had also left a trail of WRECKAGE (my emph.). All those families, fractured, all those relationships destroyed.” (Chapter 15, p.109). How does Hill know this except what the backsliders told him?

Hill continues: “Maura opened her Bible to the book of Galatians, where the ‘fruits of the Spirit’ are enumerated…(she lists them). Deborah & Jim hardly lacked for self-control. But were they loving? Were they joyful? Were they peaceful?

Well, the Scriptures also say, “If anyone wants to sue you & take away your tunic, let him (or her!) have your cloak also”, Mt. 5:40. We did this MS, Mr. Hill. And what about 1 Cor. 6:1?: “Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, & not before the saints?” -1 Cor. 6:1, NKJV. Paul continues: “But brother goes to law against brother, & that before unbelievers!”, v.6.

After Paul makes his statement about Christians taking other Christians to the secular law, he puts forth a vice list of sins that will keep the violators out of God’s Kingdom. He mentions fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, homosexuals/sodomites, thieves, covetous, drunks, revilers, extortioners. MS fits adultery, thief (she stole our property using lies), covetous (she lusted for $$), using extortion etc.

We judged the sexual matter according to Scripture. We refused to go to the courts as she did. As per her “judgment”, the Bible tells us “not to keep company with anyone named a brother (or sister), who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or extortioner – not even to eat with such a person – 1 Cor. 5:9-13. Verse 13 is exactly what we were compelled (by Scripture) to do! “Therefore put away from yourselves the evil person”. We all wanted Maura to get her life in Christ in order. To allow this kind of immorality to remain in camp, as leaders, would put us at odds with God & His Word.

Hill can say whatever he thinks or believes. We are not obligated to him whatsoever, nor to MS or any secular law/court. Period!

Rebekah – Maura’s Daughter
The following – Unbelievable – is taken from the PX2 Files Trilogy #2, p.13:

UNBELIEVABLE.

Need PROOF?

I have, before me, the ACMTC cassette/video list that starts with my first taped message, 5/16/1983, and I can see all the way to 12/31/1987. In this period of time, with the Schmierer family living with us, I covered 591 TAPED MESSAGES (up until the time we supposedly locked up “Momma Maura” in that dark and dreary shed for 10 weeks/6 months – she claims BOTH CONFLICTING time periods in different places!!!).

Now, these messages were only the ones that were recorded. We also gave hundreds of exhortations, pep-talks, rebukes, warning, and other studies never recorded – Rebekah and “Momma Maura” hearing them also.

My Point?

My point is this: We make SURE that all ACMTC soldiers understand what SIN is, the consequence of disobeying God’s written Word, etc. We gave tests on many subjects – after all, were (and are!) a Missions Training Corps! And we drilled the students on the Bible, not on how loyal they were to us, but to Jesus Christ, His Will, His Word, His Way.

Another thing, Rebekah made the rank of 2^nd Lieutenant, which means she qualified for that rank by example of duty and academia. There was NO WAY that she can claim “I didn’t know!” stuff.

SHE KNEW.

She knew what “spiritual adultery” was and is. So did “Momma Maura.” Rebekah at least tried to live the Christian life, but “Momma” faked her conversion all along…see the whole “PX2 Files” now. See someone who refused to take Godly correction, repent, and do things God’s Way. Isn’t this what Christianity is all about?…living righteously, honestly, holy (as best as we can)?

And, Rebekah, where did you learn to “WEEP” as you tell your LIES? Not from us!

The only right thing for you to do is REPENT OF YOUR LIES AND GET IT RIGHT WITH GOD. Why haven’t you refuted our “Px2 Files”?

The above clip was in ref. To Rebekah appearing on certain TV shows in defense of Maura. She actually started the “Child Abuse” LIE! On the Dr. Phil show (2006) she said we made her BEAT her son! Yep! BEAT!!! After this both mom & daughter went on a verbal RANT claiming we beat children even starving them. That’s right! All this ended with the arrest of Deborah & me (plus others) in 2017. The main indictment was, yes, you guessed it, “child abuse”. But this was overturned after Deborah had spent 4 and a half years in prison. All abuse charges were dropped – they were all made up by the enemies.

So, in closing why didn’t MS mention Child Abuse in her court declaration? Not a word! But after the lawsuit was won by default she began to tell any & all that we abused children or had her & her daughter to do it. Even liar Julie Gudino got on the bandwagon with Child Abuse. But this backfired on her, for she, not us, is guilty of abuse (see our other articles where Deborah’s attorney & special agent Pete Baca talked about JG’S son being BEAT by her, not us!)

Hill writes about Maura’s “WIN” (1.2 million dollars): “Maura had won. She had actually won…” (p.117). But not really by proof of wrong doing by us but by default. We did what Scripture tells; do not go to the law of unbelievers. Hill makes his words hurt: “two years earlier, the Greens had placed her under a ‘judgment’ for the crime of ‘spiritual adultery’.” Let me correct Hill. It was for physical adultery. Maura is the one who said “spiritual adultery”. Be honest here.

He continues: “Now it was Maura’s turn to PUNISH (my emph.) Jim & Deborah with a judgment all her own”. Well, this is not correct either. It was her & her criminal attorney Robert D. Blasier. It has been asked WHY didn’t MS/RB put criminal charges against the Greens, seeing many “criminal acts” were committed? Well, the truth is & was, neither of them could PROVE in court that we – the Greens – had actually committed criminal acts. So, a non-criminal judgment does not require 100 percent proof. There was never a police report filed, even when they claimed we tore down/burnt one of our homes. Det. Steve Chavez (N.M. Sheriff) went so far as to (lie!) say we burnt all 5 Art Shops down (see other articles posted). Yep! Burnt them down!

On p.117 Hill writes about property damage. We don’t deny taking what belonged to us but they claim we literally TRASHED Ft. Freedom. Hill writes: “And so Deborah has done the unthinkable. She has called for the compound’s destruction”. Hill goes to extreme (p.117) in telling what we supposedly did. Of course he was not there. But don’t sweat the small stuff. Just believe what he has written. Seems like “if” we actually did or had done what he writes, the attorney/MS would have at least called for an investigation. He continues his “destruction” rant on p.118.

Hill gets so EXCITED at the destruction being done (in his imagination) that he writes, “Group members have sawed through the wooden foundation, thrust spikes into the roof, ripped up the floors, & exploded the walls as if with a HAND GRENADE”. “The damage is so extensive that the house will eventually have to be taken down”. Barracks 3 is the one that was torn down, not by us, but by the state of CA. for a parking lot. Of course we were blamed for setting fire to it, burning it down. But we have video of it being torn down with state equipment. Sorry about that! No record at any fire dept. of the house burning.

Of course Hill’s genre is all about sales. Make it exciting! Make it criminal! Get the public to buy the story & the book, The Oracle’s Daughter, Good Luck!

Extra

As per Paul’s 1 Cor. 6:1 statement, “Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to low before the unjust, & not before saints?” The pagan judges were termed ὁικασται from their presumed righteousness in the admin. of justice; here Paul, by paronomasia, calls them αὁικoι, unrighteous persons. As then, now. The courts/judges are very corrupt in many ways, especially in spiritual matters.

Even if we had challenged MS in court, there is no doubt we would have lost because of the “bad” reputation we had in Sacramento, Calif. Many news outlets had homosexuals working in them & for them. We were already hated by the LGBTQ community for our Biblical stand. The church in CA. Didn’t like us for our “cutting edge” message to their church mess of compromise.

According to Scripture God’s leaders are commanded to deal with sin & sinning members, not the world. Maura & her attorney, both, claimed to be “Christian”. Paul says in v.2, “Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? & if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?” If Christians are not to judge outsiders, neither are outsiders to judge them. In Judaism rabbis deduced from Ex. 21:1 that it was unlawful to take a case before idolatrous judges.

It was customary to appoint 3 judges to handle cases among the Jews (FYI see Strack Talmud and Midrasch, III, 364-65). Some scholars believe Paul is not thinking of a permanent legal status for the Church; in vivid expectation of the consummation of the divine rule the apostle is pleading that its members begin now to exercise the responsibilities which shall not involve criminal law, but concern property grievance (vv.7,8).

In our case, Maura’s attorney was/is a criminal lawyer but rules us a non-criminal case. Why? No evidence of criminal activity, although Maura’s claims of imprisonment/abuse etc. is CRIMINAL! We knew & we know that we never held her against her will nor did any physical or mental abuse to her or upon her. She merely lies to make her case.

Paul himself had dealt with a sexual case in chapter 5: “It is reported commonly that there is fornication (or immorality) among you…v.1. Paul is rebuking the Corinthians for allowing such sexual immorality to exist in their midst. Some would have avoided the sexual immorality in our camp rather than deal with it. You can see the sheer HELL we’ve endured over the years BECAUSE we dealt with Maura’s sex issue. Read all of chapter 5. You think we were cruel in the matter of adultery, Paul wrote: “To deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit be saved…”, v.5

Is this “Love” or “Hate”? It would be considered “Hate” to allow a sinning member to remain unchallenged. A leader or leaders has the God given right & responsibility to keep the camp clean, to maintain a high standard of morality. To leave sin & the sinner alone the whole church would become infected with sexual looseness. Is not today’s Church a cesspool of filth? True, there are exceptions but too many churches are sin-pits.

For the world to pronounce of “guilty” for obeying Scripture is a crime itself. Harsh criticism from people like Hill & dozens of other Christ-haters is evident that we are doing what is right. We did not put MS out but did restrict her in some ways as to not infect the whole body of believers. We don’t need Hill et al. to be our judge. We have Christ Jesus.

WOS 7/28/26 – TOUCH NOT MY ANOINTED

I speak unto you this day and I declare quite plainly that you are not to touch My anointed, for they are Mine and My covering is over them. When people imagine they can touch by causing harm to those whom I have called and chosen, the ones who harm The Faithful will be punished. Know that vengeance belongs to Me and I am well able to cause troubles, vexations, torments, and many sorrows to the fools who have hurt My True and Faithful Messengers chosen by Me.

These are times when there are many ludicrous and vile persons who, motivated by demons, are continually attempting to bring harm unto My Chosen by mutilating the character of the Faithful. They do this with malicious and deep hatred within themselves, waiting for the chance to see death come to those who are ones who have obeyed Me.

Fools such as these live in lies, tell lies and more lies. The more they spread their fabricated tales of bad conduct against the Chosen, the more personal misery will come upon them. Some of them will die prematurely as I the Living God can take their lives at any moment I so choose. I have reproved kings for the sake of those who have proven themselves to be worthy of the mission they have been given to complete.

The dogs who are full of madness, as the enemies of My Chosen are, will plot continually upon their beds as to what they should do to destroy and see put to death those who declare The Truth with boldness. Stop and consider, these soured up and bitter vessels are used for dishonor and they love it so because they are literally full of filthy and vile declarations.

They are possessed by demon powers to the extent that they have been turned over to the reprobate mind. They cannot differentiate the difference between the precious and the vile and they believe if they can make people believe that the precious are vile, these will rise up against them. With the full cooperation of Media and her minions, they go off on long verbal sprees whereby they sound like fools drunk on deceit. The lies they tell grow more and more outlandish and they want nothing more than to be applauded and treated as “heroes” keeping people away from The Truth.

Inasmuch as they are blinded by the god of this world, the devil and his robot demon spirits, they cannot or do not want to see what they are doing. For the reality is, the more that they attempt to devastate, destroy, and put to death My Anointed, the more they’re being prepared for Hotel Hell as they will definitely go there when they die. While they believe they will become rich and famous off of their outlandish, outrageous, slanderous lies, they are filling up the cup of torments to be poured out to them in Hell.

Over and over, when they are locked in their horrid rooms in Hotel Hell, even the very walls will chant their lies back to them. They will be unable to escape the grossness of their wickedness for the same will be shown to them day after day, night after night. They will be burning forever under the heat of the flames which burn them day and night. The fire never goes out and no matter how long they shout for water, there is none for them.

Stop and consider that those who see themselves as “heroes” are counted as zeroes before Me. This means essentially, they have nothing to present to Me which shows they have done good things, when really they are puppets and the devil has pulled the strings. Oh, yes they will face the facts, the devil is a liar and a murderer from the beginning.

They will see they made an atrocious mistake when they invested their lives in the devil’s plan and were dupes for all his false promises made to them. More than anything, they will come to understand that they were under the demands and the commands of the devil and his demons, and all they did by their willingness to be used, was to lose. They will lose their lives on earth, not able to take any profit they made of demeaning My True Prophets, with them. As they gobbled up the sweet deceits the demons promised them, they got nothing but the ticket paid for in advance which would give them immediate entry into the darkest chambers in Hell.

How dull and dumb they really were while the demons told them they were clever in giving the false reports of imagined harm done to them by the Upright and Honest Messengers I sent to them to get them to Repent. Of course The Truth they heard out of the mouths of The Prophets will haunt them forever because they hated The Truth and the Messengers I sent.

Cheaply they sold their souls as they hated The Truth and the True Prophets, instead they chose to be covered by lying demonic spirits and to end up in the place of continual torment where they could ferment in lies. Then they will explode like a corked bottle, spewing forth the rotten, bitter juices of their own filthiness. For hours they can spew and pour out more and more filth, then attempt to lie down when they are done but cannot. This is because they will never find rest nor be able to sleep as they will be on a 24/7 schedule that never will end. Masses of Madness will be in them and around them as they partake of their rewards.

Be thankful to be Called and Chosen and therefore covered in The Truth and keeping in the Way I have Chosen you for. Declare the Truth and know that I am with you and by My Spirit’s indwelling, guide you in Life.

LISTEN TO WORD HERE

Are We to JUDGE Sexual Immorality?

By: Gen. Jim – 7/5/26

Plaintiff: Maura, an X-ACMTC captain, was judged and dismissed from her position in 1987 in Sacramento, CA. I have her official 25-page court doc/declaration filed by her attorney Robert D. Blasier in 1988.

Events Beginning in Jan. 1987

On page 4, Maura Schmierer (MS) writes: “On Jan. 9, 1987, at a Saturday evening group prayer meeting ‘Gen.’ Jim Green announced that one of us was going to be ‘judged’… Tomorrow he said, ‘judgment will come down & the person being judged will wish himself/herself DEAD!” (my emph.).

Q. Did I actually make that statement? Numerous accusations have been laid at our feet – “he said” (Gen. Jim), “she said” (Gen. Lila/Deborah). There is no proof in audio or print that I made that statement. True, MS was put on trial for sexual misconduct (adultery), but if I actually said that, why did MS use the words “himself/herself dead!”? There was no male member on trial, only a female – MS.

Apropos / Fitting the Occasion

The issue is this: is it Biblical to judge a sinning member of a church or Christian organization?

On page 1, MS writes/states: “I, Maura A. Schmierer, declare that I am the plaintiff in the above-entitled action (law suit of 20 million dollars). The following information is being provided to the court as part of the default proceedings in this case. This declaration is based on my personal knowledge unless specified otherwise.”

What Does God’s Word Say?

Do we as ministers of God, called of God, anointed of God have the permission to deal with sin & sinners? I mean going beyond preaching/teaching from Scripture? It is one thing to examine God’s Word in cases of, say, sexual immorality, which in our case it was adultery.

To Be “Biblically Correct” vs. “Politically Correct”

We basically know how the world views sexual promiscuity – they promote it, idolize it, and worship it. So, we’re not to trust the legal system in this matter.

Immorality & Litigation

I have resorted to various cases by some Bible scholars on this issue. But my main source & author is the Bible itself & the author is Paul the apostle.

The test case of the crisis of authority & the Gospel is found in 1 Cor. 5:1-6:20. Here in chapter 5, vs. 1 Paul starts out with, “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you… that a man has his father’s wife!” – NKJV. The KJV uses the word “fornication”, as does the ASV et al. So, just what was the name of the sexual sin? Incest! This sin was being either tolerated or condoned within the Corinthian Ekklesia.

Now, if we replace the word “incest” with the word “adultery” we’ll make our case.

How did Paul know about this sexual problem?: “It is actually reported.” We could go back to 1:11: “For it has been declared (reported) to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you.” So, Paul’s response to the report (1:10-6:20) is addressed. [note: for the relationship of the 2 matters in chap. 6 to those in chaps. 5 & 7, one can be researched].

If we zoom ahead in time, in the Church, we find big & small disagreements on the LGBTQ plus issue: some believe that sexual immorality is not a BIG DEAL! While others say it is.

Notice!

If you are of the liberal mindset, pray tell me how you can dismiss what Paul calls “sexual immorality”? Please note: “sexual immorality” is mentioned in 5:1 (twice); “sexually immoral people”, v. 9, 10, 11; in v. 13 Paul calls the Sexually Immoral person “the evil person”. Paul writes in 6:9 that “fornicators”, “adulterers”, “homosexuals” / “sodomites”, “will NOT inherit the Kingdom of God”, v. 10. He goes on to mention “sexual immorality” in v. 13, uses the word “harlot” in v. 15, tells the believers to “flee sexual immorality” in v.18, he uses the words “sexual immorality sins” in v. 18. He proceeds in chap. 7 to mention “sexual immorality” in v. 2.

So, if “sexual immorality” wasn’t important, Paul’s mention of it was a waste of time!

Action – to Revolution!

“In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when you are gathered together (trial), along with my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, deliver such a one to Satan…”, 5:4, 5. What? Did I quote him right? Sure did! Yet, in the case of MS, we merely dismissed her from her captainship. The “abuse” she speaks of in her doc is not what we did to her, but what she did to herself? Period! (read our PX2 Files)

Prof. G.D. Fee began teaching a course in 1 Corinthians at Wheaton College in 1970. Later he studied at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. I have read his theological books & found them to be very informative. He was/is not a liberal. Thank God. In his 880-page book, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (1987), on p. 195, he writes: “This crisis of authority, then, is what seems to hold chapters 1-6 together. It should be noted, that there is also a conceptual tie between 6:1-11 & 5:1-13. Paul concludes the argument at the end of chapter 5 by stating that believers are not to judge those outside the church; rather, they are to judge those inside, meaning of course the incestuous man.”

Like I said, replace “incest” with “adultery”, we did exactly what the Bible instructs.

But before we actually held a trial on MS’s adultery, we dealt with her more than once – as the Bible also speaks of.

[note: for how a Christian trial is conducted see Mt. 18:15-20]

The Case of the Incestuous Man

This, as many scholars will tell us, creates an enormous number of problems for the PC/Woke/liberals.

First, we must ask, “How did this incest come about in a Christian Ekklesia? Second, how does the remedy offered apply to today’s Church?” Trust me, if one even dares to confront sexual immorality (SI) today, one will find himself/herself in hot water. Today, with Political Correctness / Wokeism/ liberalism in full operation – in politics & religion – sexual irregularity is looked upon as no big deal. Yep! “No big deal!” [see Demos., or. 59.122 (Loeb, VI, 445, 447, Loeb Classical Library]. We read: “Mistresses we keep for the sake of pleasure, concubines for the daily care of the body, but wives to bear us legitimate children.”

We well know that the Judeo-Christian moral restrictions on human sexuality were not easily absorbed by pagan converts. Paul as well as others therefore had to confront all this Sexual Immorality stuff. (see 1 Thes. 4:1-8; Col. 3:5-7; Eph. 5:3-13. From 1 Cor. 6:9-10 Sexual Immorality had been part of the Corinth life-style; on the basis of 5:9, 6:12-20, 7:2, & 10:8 (see also 2 Cor. 12:21), we can deduce that they had continued that life-style into their new existence in Christ.

In the case of Maura Schmierer, she, as both Deborah Lila & myself had been a hippie, where sexual immorality had no limits. She carried this into her new Christian life. We did not! Adultery to her as to most lost in that world of sexual looseness, was no big deal. But for 5 years we, Deborah & I taught against Sexual Immorality.

We Were Lenient

To be Lenient means not harsh or severe in disciplining, punishing, judging, etc. It also means mild, merciful. MS describes her judgment in the most abusive terms. She uses the word “ordered” 29 times, “orders”, once, “forced”, once, “forbidden”, once. Did we, as the apostle Paul, “deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh” (1 Cor. 5:5)? No! Did we, after the trial, put her outside the believing community – a command that is repeated no less than 4 times (vv. 2, 4-5, 7, & 13)? No! We allowed her to stay within the camp, living in several quarters at will. We also allowed her to work at the Art Shop, earning her own $$.

In a passage that is full of exegetical difficulties, as scholars point out, (vv. 3-5), Paul outlines how & why they are to carry out the expulsion, & in vv. 6-8 he offers by way of analogy his own theological basis for it. Paul returns to the ekklesia’s attitude in vv. 9-13 & ties it directly to their misunderstanding or disregard of his former letter, in which he had already spoken to these matters – they are “to judge those inside”, expelling the man from the community.

We, after the trial, suggested that MS go to her mother’s home until her marriage could be settled. She did go but literally begged to come back! (read about this in the PX2 Files). But we never expelled her at first. We hoped she would & could get things right with God, her husband & all ACMTC.

She, on page 2, writes about being “ousted” (her word) from the group. She was not “ousted” but asked to go to live with her mom:

She wrote this: “Dear Generals, Thank you again for your love & your care over my soul… I know that I’ve grieved you beyond any point of begging you to plead with God that I might stay… My mother will be picking me up at 9:00. I will not linger & suffer you to see me another day. As much as I know how to love, I love everyone here dearly & I pray when God is done working me over (not the mean ol’ Generals!) that I’ll be able to come home, (signed) Forsaken.” (dated March 1987, from Letter 6, Original Doc.).

This is truly sad! While I never held any grudge against her, what she did months later, with her crooked attorney Robert Blasier, we were forced to defend ourselves by posting PX2 Files (years later).

Her Big Lie!

This “Big Lie” – “they held me captive” – is going on as I write. Harrison Hill’s fiction book (which he calls non-fiction), The Oracle’s Daughter talks about the plight of MS. Of course, he misrepresents all of us who judged MS for her sexual misconduct – Biblically!

Ordered to Leave!

MS can’t stop using the word “ordered”. Here in Letter 8, she writes:

“Dear Generals, I did as ordered, I got a job. There were no live-in jobs as Gen. Jim suggested…” This was dated July 1987. This was written after I suggested, not “ordered”, that she leave & get a job, which she did. If, as she later testified under oath, “escaped”, WHY we ask did she write: “Could I receive Battle Cry? Tapes? Is there anything I can do for you? Paint, clean sidewalks? Anything? Thank you again for your long suffering [sic] towards me. Forsaken.”

If only she would have not allowed her attorney to BRAINWASH her in her 20-million-dollar suit. How has that turned out for her? She eventually had to confess to her “imprisonment” / “escape” genre.

“Forced on A.F.D.C”?

On page 25 of her declaration, she writes: “I am now forced to be on A.F.D.C., which is added humiliation…” But she wasn’t FORCED at all. She, as stated in Letter 8, had a job.

It is natural for a person guilty of a committed offense/transgression to deny it. Some will launch a great offensive, as did MS, making up BIG & small lies against their accusers. As per her offensive against us in 1988, brought much negative press coverage; years of “I ESCAPED a CULT” have transpired. Even when Maura did finally confess that she was not physically held captive/brainwashed, the media et al. still repeat the BIG LIE plus child abuse, which was not mentioned in her original declaration. It came later, on the Dr. Phil T.V. Show.

To Tolerate Sin?

This is the big question for today’s Church. Instead of dealing directly with “sinning saints”, the leadership (if liberal minded) will hid behind “tolerance”, allowing the sinner or sinners to escape punishment, I don’t mean physical but spiritually speaking – facing their sin or sins, repenting of the same.

James 5:19, 20 says “if anyone among you wanders (NKJV) from the truth, & someone turns him (or her) back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his (or her) way will save a soul from death & cover a multitude of sins.” But what if we merely tolerate misbehavior in our camp, church, assembly? The intention of “the trial” was to get MS to repent & come clean, which she never did (of adultery).

Recall of the Erring

James 5:19, 20, the concluding saying in these verses was possibly suggested by the mention of “sin” / “confession” in vss. 15 & 16. Our intention was to rid the “sin” out of our midst. I realize all churches deal with this. Some do as we did. Others sweep it under the church carpet. Still, there are those who actually frown at dealing with sin/sins whatsoever. The LGBTQ church is such. It reminds me of Proverbs 24:24, 25, which may be rendered, “He (or she) who says to the wicked man (or women), ‘you are righteous’, peoples shall curse him, nations shall abhor him: but to those who rebuke the wicked man (or woman) there shall be delight, & a good blessing shall come upon them.” Lev. 19:17 states, “Thou shalt surely rebuke thy neighbor, & not bear sin because of him (or her)” (ASV); Pirke Aboth (Jewish) 5:26 states, “He who leads many to virtue, through him shall no sin befall.” And for “cover… sins” see Ps. 32:1; Prov. 10:12; & 1 Peter 4:8, “Love covers a multitude of sins.” This last Scripture is used too often: “And above all things, have fervent LOVE for one another, for ‘love will cover a multitude of sins.’” Just what does that mean in light of judging sin/sinners?: “Above all… have fervent charity (love) among yourselves…” If we neglect to deal with sin/sinner, we’re not showing Christian love; we are showing humanistic love. God’s “love” (ἀγάπη) is the cardinal Christian virtue. Charity (KJV) is a word that has come down in the world of words. Nor is “love” (RSV) itself a perfect rendering, as some Bible scholars point out; for all sorts of nuances cling to it. ‘’Epws, the other Gk. word for “love”, is the love which craves, &, at its worst, lusts. ‘Aγάπη is the “love” which seeks not to possess but to give. “Caring” conveys something of its meaning.

So, if we use 1 Pet. 4:8 as an excuse NOT TO deal with sin/sinner, how are we to keep the “camp free of defilements”? Exegetes, preachers, teachers et al. are puzzled by Ja. 5:20 & 1 Pet. 4:8 (N.T.). Going back into the O.T. Hebrew, Prov. 10:12 says, “Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.” Are we to believe “love” atones for other people’s sins? The modern PC /Woke /progressive /liberal church thinks it does. But true love does not allow sin to go on… destroying precious lives.

Sin destroys! The Bible says so!

WHY?

If sin isn’t “all that bad!” Why, we ask, did John, Jesus, Peter and Paul (& others as well) call for “repentance”? REPENT! “Repent of what?” one smug PC/Woke minister mocked.

Part 2

Sin Destroys!

This is a FACT!!! Paul wrote: “Do you not know that you are the temple of God & that the Spirit of God dwells in you?” (1 Cor. 3:16). Paul goes on to say, “If anyone defiles (lit., destroys) the temple of God, God will destroy him (or her). For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.” NKJV. We should know that if one or we ourselves “tolerates” known sin, this is an offense to God. Sexual immorality, along with other vices, will destroy our bodies & relationship with the Father, the Son, & the Holy Spirit. Church discipline nearly disappeared these days – “love” prevails! But humanistic love.

The Man, Not the Woman Judged

1 Cor. 5 pronounces no judgment on the woman, only the man. Some believe the reason is that the man belonged to the ekklesia, not the woman. God, not the Christians, judges those outside the Church. The final say-so by Paul = “hand this man over to Satan.” Isn’t this a bit harsh & unloving? It shows the strictness of the early Church.

Chapter 5, the opening paragraph follows hard on the heel of 4:14-21. Vs. 21 Paul writes: “What do you want? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in love & a spirit of gentleness?” (NKJV). The “rod” was not physical but spiritual. This paragraph is a bold expression of Paul’s apostolic authority (see vv. 9-11).

The apostle begins by expressing dismay at the relaxed attitude toward a member of the assembly at Corinth, who is living in incest. The Church was not at all disgusted, but “puffed up!” (v. 2), i.e. “proud”. Sounds like so many churches today. We’ve even got “drag queens”, “trans”, homos, lesbians etc., leading figures in today’s “clown” shows called “Church”.

Porneia

(Gk. “sexual immorality”). The Greeks were ambivalent concerning sexual matters – didn’t matter if sex was in a brothel or a church. But “sexual immorality”, in N.T. terms, included all kinds of sex – between women/women – men/men, young girls & boys. These words had been picked up in Hellenistic Judaism, always pejoratively, to cover all extramarital sexual sins/aberrations, including homosexuality, especially the “scarlet letter”, see PX4 Files.

Incest or Adultery – Both Forbidden in Scripture

One should read the Holiness Code found in Lev. 18. Here one encounters sexual sins that damn the body – soul – spirit. God calls them “abomination”. I’ve written extensively on these “sins”, yet, we are still condemned by both the Church & the world for pointing all these sins out. [note: see the “Penal Code” & the “Judgments” in 1 QS 6:24 – 7:25 (IQS = “Rule of the Community”). Theirs was a rite of discipline that had missed the “awful” character of human sinfulness, & therefore was purely ascetic, i.e. a person who leads a life of contemplation & rigorous self denial for religious purposes. Some scholars don’t believe (here in 1 Cor. 5) Paul was dealing with.

Ready – Action – Roll

Paul was ready to take action against the man guilty of incest. He had, upon hearing about this sin, “have already judged (as though I were present) him who has so done this deed,” 1 Cor. 5:3. Paul knew what the Word said (O.T. H.C.) Paul judged this sexual matter with community involvement: the community constitutes the forum.

Actual Judgment

“Deliver such a one to Satan,” v. 5 Paul uses similar language in 1 Tim. 1:20: “… Hymenaeus & Alexander, whom I delivered to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme.”

We conclude that sexual sins were frowned upon in the early Church. There was no N.T., only O.T. Paul has several “vice” lists in the N.T. (after it came into being), 1 Cor. 6:9-10 being one to look at. He puts sexual sins at the top.

MS, in her years of “rants” against us for judging her sexual sin, paints us as the WORST of the WORST. But we did what needed to be done. We do not apologize. No sir, not a bit. We dealt with a sin of adultery!

[note: besides Paul’s “deliver to Satan” texts, there are no other N.T. texts as an EXPULSION from a religious community. However, there are some remote parallels in the magical papyri, but these are personal execrations spoken directly to the god of the underworld, see Demon of the Dead,… “I hand over to you so-&-so [the name is missing], in order that…” See Deissmann, LAE, p. 302.

Some believe that Paul’s language – “deliver one over to Satan” – was quasitechnical, not a real statement of turning the man over to Satan. They think Paul merely meant this as an expression, not an actual execration.

Part 3

Like I said, there are many interpretations on 1 Cor. 5: incest. Some believe incest was not the issue, for they conclude that the person in question had married the wife of his deceased father, not his own mother, but stepmother, then a widow. [one should read Prof. Adam Clarke’s interpretation, Clarke’s Commentary, vol. 6, pp. 212-215).

There are good scholars, old & current, that the two texts about delivering persons unto Satan are extraordinary cases, in which the body & the mind of an incorrigible/sinful transgressor were delivered by the authority of God into the power of Satan, to be dealt with. Both Deborah and myself have at times prayed for certain people to receive “whatever it takes” for them to turn away from sin & back to God. We never pray for God to bless anyone in their sin(s). God’s mercy/love, at times, can be severe! Isn’t it love to pray for an erring soul – to receive punishment in this life – rather than to face Hell in the end? Yet many call this harsh & unloving.

Case-in-Point

Lest we forget, remember Ananias & Sapphira, man & wife, both part of a Christian community, both lied to the Holy Ghost & to the apostles, and both were STRUCK DEAD by God! This my dear Christians is New Testament. Read Acts 5:1-11. STRUCK DEAD!

And, for the record, remember Elymas the sorcerer STRUCK BLIND by the power of God (see Acts 13:8 -11). Here Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, told this evil person, “you shall be blind…” And so it was. So, God’s Spirit deals with both “sinning saints” & “sinners” of the world. Here God entrusted Paul with this judgment /punishment.

Maura’s Problem

She, in her declaration to the superior court of California, county of Sacramento, tells the court that we “ordered” her to do this, do that – all lies! We never ordered her to do anything as she claims. Her 8 handwritten letters testify to the FACTS (read them, posted on our PX2 Files). What is the truth? Which, the declaration or the letters? She chose to remain in camp, go thru her “supposed” punishments. Like she has stated, “The door (of the shed) was not locked, I could have left.” She stated this on the 2006 Dr. Phil show, before an audience of millions of viewers. Yet for years – 1988-2006 = 18 years – she told the media that she was OUR PRISONER & she finally ESCAPED! Both lies!

If we had held her “captive”, which we certainly DID NOT!, it would have been for remedial sake, i.e. for her to repent & confess to God her sin of adultery. But from 1987-2026 she has never done this. She goes on media outlets & cries about her awful plight at the hands of those “evil Generals, Jim & Deborah Green.” Yep! Boo hoos continually. Then she makes herself available to Harrison Hill, “character assassin”, spitting in his ear about her “drama-trauma”. “Oh, please pity me!!!” And, so, Oracle’s Daughter (book released April 7, 2026) features “Queen Maura” as a “victim” of ACMTC.

Part 4

“After the meal, Maura left the mess hall & stumbled back to Barracks 1, speechless with dread. She curled up into a fetal position on the bedroom floor. The entire world had fallen away. Nothing remained for her but the appalling certainty that all was lost” – The Oracle’s Daughter, p. 88 (book that has 319 pages)

Q. How does Hill know this? He was not there.

Hill continues with his “Maura drama-trauma”: “If Maura had felt even a modicum of hope, it disappeared the moment Deborah opened the door to her office. Immediately Deborah pulled back, repulsed, as if Maura were drenched in sewage,” p. 89.

Let’s not forget Harrison Hill received his MFA in nonfiction from Columbia Univ. (one of the most LIBERAL/WOKE/PC universities in the U.S. He became a journalist. This tells us that he was/is good at telling stories, be they true or false. Well, only we here at ACMTC know what actually was said & done in those early days at Fort Freedom. He makes his genre exciting, throws lots of anti-generals/ACMTC stuff in the mix, Puff! “Oracle’s Daughter”!!!! His fiction book (for most part) is, as one author wrote, “Beautifully told, unputdownable, & urgently necessary.” On the back jacket of Oracle’s Daughter (with 331 pages) we read: “… Harrison Hill has written a MASTERWORK (my emph.) of Narrative NONFICTION (my emph.).” Another quote says, “Riveting… Takes the reader deep inside the female-led ACMTC…” Still another writes: “If you’ve ever wondered how a person could fall prey to a high-control group, or what it takes to GET OUT (my emph.), this book is essential reading.” I could write a smaller book refuting OD. It would be easy, for Deborah & I were there, not Hill. And what is worse, he takes the word of proven LIARS / sex offenders over facts we have, (like the FBI interviews of 11 ACMTC children that refute, demolish the BIG LIE of child abuse).

Back to Page 89

After the “drenched in sewage” statement, Hill goes on to detail what happened next: “Without speaking Deborah walked to her desk & pulled out Maura’s most recent donation to the ministry: 27 dollars, a bibically mandated 10 percent of her last paycheck.” FYI: We never demanded people give 10 percent to the ministry; it was voluntary. In fact, I gave 2/3 of my pay check, not 10 percent! We let the people decide for themselves. I don’t recall ever having – in writing or spoken – where we demanded $$. To this very day we operate the same way. We never, I mean NEVER took up offerings. We did at one time have a wooden box where people could give if they wanted to. I still have that box – I see it now.

Well, Hill goes on in his anti-Deborah rant, “Deborah threw the bills to the floor & spit on them. Then she launched into a prophecy…” Really Harrison? Where did you ever get such a story? If MS, Deborah & myself were the only ones in the office, who told this to you… or did you just make it up, as you’ve done throughout your book? You write about a lot of things that can’t be verified – except through liars like MS.

When this (falsely reported) event was over, Hill writes: “When Deborah was finished, Jim told Maura she could leave. ‘Go in SHAME’ Deborah said.” Both of these statements are falsehoods. We were there, not Hill. MS was there. It was either her or Hill that made up this lie. You guess!!!

Hill Does Us a Favor!

Yep! Sure does. His book actually reports what we’ve said for years. How So? For decades now, MS has claimed that she was LOCKED into a shed for 10 weeks at sometimes; 6 months at other times. LOCKED UP!!!… like an animal as the media reported. But Hill goes into detail of Maura’s “prison” activities during her 6 month stay after her trial.

Poor Maura – had to work! Work? But she told the media & the court she was locked up, locked down. Her testimony under oath actually verifies what we’ve said all along – MS was not locked inside a dark, damp, dirty tiny shed for 10 weeks / 6 months – no bathroom etc. Read our PX2 Files, see if this is not true.

Part 5

Let’s return to the incestuous man. The turning him over to Satan (lit. or fig.) was for redemptive/restorative of the Corinth Church Community as well as for the person himself. Don’t forget that Paul warns the Corinth Church that those who commit sexual sins (et al.) WILL NOT inherit the kingdom (see 1 Cor. 6:9, 10). Repentance is in order; if not, judgement. Even in Paul’s warning, it holds out the invitation to STOP sinning! This is what we did with MS, many times, before the trial, we dealt with her. Hill et al. wants us to believe we hated Maura, wanted to destroy her marriage etc. If this was true we would NEVER have promoted her to captain, but kept her at private rank. Think people, think! Don’t believe what a want-to-be-famous writer tells us. Our mission was to get the lost saved & the saved disciplined for missions. We were not playing the numbers game. If we were, disciplining would be counter-productive.

So, we ask, what happened to the sinful man who was turned ever to Satan?

Well, we can find the answer in Paul’s second epistle to the Corinthians: “But if anyone has caused grief, he has not grieved Me, but all of you to some extent – not to be too severe. This punishment which was inflicted by the majority is sufficient for such a man,” -2 Cor. 2:5, 6, NKJV. Here Paul seems to refer particularly to the incestuous person. Paul’s “but in part””, Gk. ἐκ μέρους & απο μερονε, which Paul uses frequently in his epistles, are to be referred to the people. A part of them had acknowledged Paul (1:14), & here, a part of them had given him cause of grief; & therefore he adds, “that I may not overcharge you all,” v. 5; as only a part of you has put me to pain, (viz. the transgressor, & those who were “puffed up, & have not rather mourned, that he who has done this deed might be taken away from among you,” -2 Cor. 5:2. You see, one bad apple can spoil a bucket of apples. In the case of MS, we had to deal with her sex sin, as we did with others as well. She was not singled out, as Hill et al. believes, but she was the one who refused to repent, come clean. Others did this; some left but caused us no problem. But MS went to the world, not to God.

In 2 Cor. 2:8, Paul urges the members “to reaffirm your love to him.” Did the transgressor repent? Instead of Paul hating the transgressor, he gives proof of his parental tenderness. He writes in v. 10, “To whom ye forgive anything, I forgive also: for if I forgave anything, to whom I forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it in the person of Christ.” Although the transgressor brought shame upon himself & upon the Church, Paul forgives him. He obviously repented.

Since Christ forgives repentant persons, we too must do the same. Note what Paul writes next: “Lest Satan should get an advantage of us…” v. 11. If we fail to forgive, as Christ forgives, we too can be taken advantage of by Satan.

Hill wants his readers to believe we acted out of meanness. But that is his opinion. The truth is, we wanted Maura to be repentant, thus restored to her captain position. The media all these years, paint a wrong picture of what actually happened. If MS fell into despair it was not our fault. She could have confessed, repented, & she could be with our community today. Most original ACMTC members are still with us, at least the foundational ones. They all, without exception, know what did & did not happen in our formative years. But good ending stories don’t sell, only those with blood, & gore!

We have seen thus far that putting a sinning member on trial is Biblical. And we have seen that being a minister is not idyllic – one has to deal with the unpleasant. If one, like us, does actually put one on trial, get ready to be branded as ignominious, shameful, disgraceful, hateful – CULTISH! To sell a story there has to be villain, mean, cruel, loathsome character, while the “victim” or “victims” are painted in painful terms – she suffered SO MUCH at the hands of those MEAN OL’ GENERALS, especially the MEAN OL’ general Deborah… who babbles in tongues & gives out false prophecies. Yep! That general. One right away catches on, after reading the Oracle’s Daughter, that Hill has an UNholy HATRED for Deborah, & a sanguine LOVE for the X-ACMTC female officers (all captains!). He, as a homosexual (we’ve been told), has this romantic intoxication with Maura, Julie, Sarah, Jamie et al. These “ladies of the Night” all claim to have ACMTC/PTSD. Poor babies. He sees them as Par excellence. Yep! Truth Tellers First Class (TTFC), especially the Triadic (group of 3 = Maura, Julie, Sarah). Never mind their rapacious reptillan character, they are/were “victims” of that militant cult that calls itself “The Army of God!” Thanks, that would be us.

Part 6

Extremism Knows No Nationality

The above title is taken from Hill’s latest rant against ACMTC. His June 27th (2026) article was written to WARN the public: “Millions of Americans are currently in the grip of extremism, writes cult expert Harrison Hill. But we should not be complacent about cults in the UK,” writes one of his British friends.

Hill, as said, uses the dynamic trio, Maura, Sarah, Julie – all X-ACMTC captains – to help him in his book the Oracle’s Daughter. Hill claims it took him 5 years to write it. It is a book mainly about ACMTC. We thank God that Hill recognizes us as “extreme”, “militant”, “fanatic”, a complement! This we are without an ounce of apology. So was Jesus & so were His disciples. So should be His current Church – the Body of Christ on earth – but sadly very few are Extreme, Militant, or Fanatic. They have settled for Churchianity rather than militant Christianity.

Cult = Don’t Scare Us!!!

Yep, this 4-letter “C” word scares the devil out of most people – well, we wish anyway. Hill, like all other “cult experts” (tisk, tisk), love to use the other scary word “isolationist”, which this does not fit us whatsoever. As I have pointed out before, to “cult catchers”, Ft. Freedom was downtown Sacramento, CA; Gilgal was only a mile from downtown Biggs, CA (our ranch); Klamath Falls, OR was in a town where we lived for several years and operated a restaurant for the public; Berino, N.M. was/is located in that small New Mexican village where we have a large mission; Fence Lake, NM is the only camp that was/is outside a city or town. There we never even had a gate; people could come & visit (if not violent of course – we had to kick Dr. Phil’s T.V. crew off our property back in the early 2000s). And, may I remind Hill & other ACMTC antagonists that we have traveled the world for years. How does all this fit into that scary “Isolationist” word?

When we lived in California & Oregon, we, as a group, went to many towns/cities, held meetings; went to colleges/universities to preach & pass out free Christian literature. We were on radio for years. We were interviewed by the media countless times. So, we ask, how could we be “hidden away” and yet be out & about at the same time? Someone is lying and it isn’t us. No Sir, we have been in the public’s radar for decades. Even in prison, Hill came for an interview, which I refused.

We are not isolated! Please get it right.

Hill’s latest article, the one I’m sharing, compares ACMTC with the UK’s Jesus Army (we knew them back in the day). Hill writes: “Take the Jesus Army, recently profiled in an expansive BBC podcast series (you can check it out). The group began in the 1970s in the shadow of the counterculture. It went on to ENSNARE (my emph.) thousands of people in tightly controlled, sometimes ABUSIVE (my emph.) religious communities…” Yep, same word uses – ABUSIVE! Got to demonize any and all who joined the Jesus Army. What about the “Christian” LGBTQIA CULT? Why doesn’t Hill bring this CULT up? What he does is demonize us for disagreeing with their abominable practices. Aren’t they “Unorthodox”? Aren’t they a “fringe group”? (see all our writings against the SINS of the LGBTQIA movement – secular & religious.)

Families Separated, Members denied Access to the Outside World!

Yep! Another Big lie! While it has been our practice to warn new recruits about “family”, which Jesus certainly did – read our articles on this, esp. PX2 Files – we are not anti-family. If so, we would not be the family of God. But the natural family many times, most of the time, does not understand that Biblical Christianity has rules; sometimes families have standards that will not, do not agree with the WAY of Christ. There are times when a recruit must cut ties with abusive family members. Oh yes, abusive!

The Jesus Army, even the 1800’s Salvation Army (UK) was/has been demonized by the world & by other “religious” folks. Hill writes: “Former members alleged that it was a harbor for abuse, some of it directed at children.” Of course, the “children”. One sheriff once told me that the best way to destroy a group (like us) was to use the words “child abuse”. He said this automatically sets in motion investigation. As was in our case… ending in prison/jail time for Deborah & me (and several others). You already know the outcome: the State LIED! The Law enforcement LIED! Deborah was accused of both physical & sexual ABUSE. But this was eventually exposed by Deborah’s attorneys, & she was released from a 72-year prison term. Shows you the sheer HATRED the State of NM had/has for all of us.

It has been said, “Hill’s evaluation of ACMTC & the Greens is Shitty!” Well, to his credit, he does get some facts right (he quotes from our videos/pubs). But one can easily discern his bias, even hatred! for who we are & what we do.

Hill Continues

“The Jesus Army was startlingly similar to the ACMTC, the group at the center of my book, The Oracle’s Daughter.” But we’ve received complaints from readers that The Oracle’s Daughter is more about the “Peanut Butter Princess”, aka Maura Schmierer, than about Sarah Green. This makes sense since (we’ve heard) MS is now a lesbian (Hill, we’re told, is a homo!). Most reporters (the hostile ones) have been sex perverts. That is ok by us, just don’t try to convince us that that lifestyle (= deathstyle) is honored by God. What you do is your business, but don’t condemn us for standing up for what we believe & what the Bible teaches on sexual immorality.

Hill is repulsed by the word “Generals”: “The ACMTC was founded by a pair of ex-hippies who called themselves the ‘generals’ of ‘God’s Army’.” Correction: We are not the founders, God is! It was thru fastings & prayers that the Spirit instructed us to start an “Army that sheds no Blood”. We were told to have the rank of Colonels, not Generals. After years, we were promoted to “Generals”. Why is this so strange? The Bible is full of such things. Since WHEN has the Spirit quit speaking to His people? Who said God doesn’t speak anymore?

On page 3, Hill says, “like the Jesus Army, the cult in my book was dogged by allegations of ABUSE against children…” Hey Harrison, why stop there – go on and tell your readers that “Child Abuse” charges were made up lies. Yep! All fabricated by the State of NM, with the help of X-ACMTC members.

FYI

Let me set the record straight, because this “cult expert” won’t! Go to AggressiveChristianity.net, PX3 Files: read the 6 articles posted where the FBI interviewed 11 of our children & found NO ABUSE! Yep! ZERO ABUSE! Read the true accounts, from their records, written & videoed. Actually the SWAT raid conducted on Aug. 20, 2017, was a blessing. Sure we all were demonized by the State & media but over all, it has proved that ABUSE did not happen whatsoever. Deborah was their main target – “get her & the group will crash!”. Well, Mr. Hill, we did not crash. Sure we were scattered but certainly not destroyed. In fact, since then we have grown. Not a single member left, only 2 have died since then (older officers).

Hill goes on to mention other “cults” of by-gone days. He states that an Organization called FAIR, began in 1975 to combat the proliferation of cults & cult-like groups.” Well, organizations like CAN (Cult Awareness Network) has tried for years to BRING DOWN the GENERALS – Failed! Then the anti-Christian Org./network SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) came to ABQ. NM to hold a special meeting designed to arouse FEAR/HATRED against ACMTC some years ago (see AggressiveChristianity.Net, page 3, “The Sign of Hate”. We have posted an update (May 29, 2026), “Manufacturing Hate”, an article I wrote about this HATE group being exposed by the U.S. gov. under Prez D. Trump, you’ll be surprised what the gov. found out about this group. Please read both articles.

Hill is also a Trump hater! In fact Hill blames Trump for the “cult” plague in the U.S. Well, FYI, we were around during the Reagan administration and ever since.

Well, nuff said about Hill’s extreme hatred for “cults” like us. Did you know the Original 13 colonies were cults? Yep! They all had their declarations/laws/beliefs rooted – & grounded in the Christian faith. They were religious/political cults. Amen

Part 7

Ad Hoc

Let’s return to 1 Cor. chapter 5, sexual immorality.

The intent of Paul’s action – “deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus,” 5:5, NKJV, is the man’s eternal salvation. He is not being turned over to Satan for destruction, but turned back over into Satan’s domain to learn a lesson. Paul’s intent was not total punishment but merely punishment of the flesh. Don’t you think STDS/AIDS etc. are punishments upon the sex perverts?

What Paul does not say, & we may surmise, is how he perceived this “destruction”. We don’t know either. But what measure was taken/inflicted, it brought the transgressor to repentance. If one reads Maura’s Letters (PX2 Files = 8 of them), she realizes that her ad hoc trial was for the good, not for destruction itself. But her lawyer no doubt talked her into suing us for “damages”. We had dealt with her crooked attorney a few years before the MS saga – we both felt that he wanted our properties for his law firm – he got them! Destruction of body-soul-spirit lies with God, not with man. Chapter 5 is an ad hoc case of Church discipline, similar in kind to that suggested for the busybodies & idlers in 2 Thes. 3:6-15.

ACMTC – Too Harsh & Unloving!

So our enemies cry. In a day and in a generation when the Church TOLERATES sin of every kind – Christians must NOT be judgmental!!! Well, to Hell with “Thou shalt not judge” BS. The Bible tells us not to judge hypocritically. Some take Romans 2:1 as proof not to judge. But Paul is referring to those who judge others for the same thing they are doing, vs. 2, 3.

The reason for judgement/trial is remedial, not destruction of the soul. Paul rebukes the Corinth Church for “boasting”, vs. 6; he reminds them that a little yeast works through the whole batch of dough. He even uses the analogy in Gal. 5:9 = “A little leaven leavens the whole lump.” He tells them to get rid of the old yeast, vs. 7. Their boasting, which is totally out of place in light of the present sick condition they were in.

Paul’s metaphor/analogy is not physical illness, but a proverbial saying about “leaven” (v. 6), which in turn calls forth related imagery from the Feast of Unleavened Bread & The Passover. They are to get rid of the “old leaven” = the incestuous person, so that they might become a “new batch of dough”. For him to remain in the community would eventually spoil the whole community. In Christ – the new batch of dough – should be free of yeast.

How many churches today are puffed up with pride, tolerating sins & sinners?

Early Church Fathers

These men of God were not silent on church discipline. Allow me to quote from a few of them. Their writings reflect their beliefs on excommunications, rebuking & shunning. They find their beliefs in the writings of Matt. (18:17), on penitential discipline; Paul’s 1 Cor. 5:6, 11; Paul’s 2 Thes. 3:14; his1 Tim. 5:20; John’s 2 Jn. 10:11 etc.

Ignatius (35:107 A.D.)

(I’ll quote a little piece of their longer quotes) “… you should keep aloof from such persons” (the Gnostics), A.D. 105, 1:89; “… Paul commands us to avoid [these men who separate from the Church] after a first & second admonition ‘… He who bids them Godspeed is a partaker with their evil deeds.” (A.D. 180, 1:341, 42). In our day it would be LGBTQ members;

Irenaeus (130-200 A.D.)

“Cerdon… having been denounced for corrupt teachings, he was excommunicated from the assembly…” (A.D. 180, 1:417);

“… condemnation of sinners extended to others… ‘a little leaven leavens the whole lump.’” (A.D. 180, 1:500);

Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 150-215)

“If one must censure, it is necessary also to rebuke…” (A.D. 195, 2:228);

“The physician is not evil to the sick person because he tells him of his fever…” (A.D. 195, 2:231);

“God does not punish, He chastises – for the purpose of good.” (A.D. 195, 2:553);

“Rebukes & sacred censures are administered… the most notable example of judgment to come when anyone has sinned so grievously…” (like adultery)

Tertullian (A.D. 160-230: 197, 3:46);

“… depart from the rules of our discipline… we count such persons no longer as Christians.” (A.D. 197, 3:51);

Tertullian gives rather a lengthy address to the pagans in A.D. 197, 1:113: “Persons of this doubtful mold do not assemble with us… yet, we should… be more ready to have included among us those who have… forsaken our discipline…” (A.D. 197, 1:113)

“… For the taint of sins can be communicated as if contagious, whenever a man mixes himself with the sinner.” (A.D. 207, 3:355) This is what 1 Cor. 5 speaks about;

“All the other frenzies of passions beyond the laws of nature… we banish not only from the threshold, but from all shelter of the Church… they are monstrosities.” (A.D. 212, 4:77). Did Tertullian have in mind Romans 1:26, “vile passions”, “against nature” in ref. to homosexuality/lesbianism? I think so.

It may be noted, the Montanists taught that there is no forgiveness for major post baptismal sins. Writing as a Montanist in the following 2 passages, Tertullian criticizes the bishops of the Church for extending mercy to repent adulterers, etc. It is a fact that this Christian writer in Carthage. N. Africa, had come under the influence of the Montanist sect (around A.D. 211) The Montanist sect (cult) differed from the Christian Church on matters of discipline, not theological doctrine. He writes: “you (bishops) reply that communion is indeed denied to sinners – those polluted by the flesh (sexual sins?).” (A.D. 212, 4:94); “Here they (the bishops of the Church) go so far as to interpret ‘destruction of the flesh’ – 1 Cor. 5:5 – to be the office of repentance… by… ill-treatment devoted to the extermination of the flesh, it seems to make satisfaction to God. So they argue that the fornicator (or rather, that incestuous person) was delivered to Satan by the apostle – not with a view of ruin, but with a view of correction… on account of the ‘destruction of the flesh’, he obtained pardon.” (213 A.D., 4:87);

Origen (A.D. 185-255)

Wrote a lengthy statement in which he states, “… with regard to sins that are ‘not unto death’, i.e., not ‘death bringing’ (cites the book of Numbers) … however, Christ does not say what he will suffer if he does not hear the Church… Therefore, he is not altogether gained, nor will he altogether perish. But what at all he will suffer, … only God knows…” (A.D. 245, 9:492, 93);

In another statement Origen wrote: “Christians lament as dead those who have been conquered by… sin. For they are lost & dead to God. At some future time [if they repent], they receive them as being risen from the dead…. However, those who have lapsed & fallen after professing the Gospel are not placed in any office or post of RANK (my emph.) in the Church of God.” (A.D. 248, 4:485);

He continues: “… such evil practices do not at all prevail among Christians…. If any persons of that kind are discovered, they are at least not to be found among those who frequent the assemblies & come to the public prayers – without their being excluded from them.” (A.D. 248, 4:508). Even Maura in her testimony under oath states that we allowed her to come to meeting & also eat with us in the mess hall. So, how is this cruel?

Cyprian (died in 258 A.D.) writes: “… if a presbyter cannot be found & death begins to be imminent, they can make confession of their sin before even a deacon. Thereby, with the imposition of hands upon them for repentance, they can come to the Lord with the peace that the martyrs have desired.” (A..D. 250, J. 293).

“How can the medicine of permissiveness profit anyone?… to not require repentance makes the way easy… to do that is not curing someone. If we are honest, it is slaying him” (A.D. 250, 5:309);

“… If someone is harshly & cruelly separated from the Church, he may turn himself, herself to Gentile ways & to worldly works… or pass over to heretics & schismatics.” (A.D. 250, 5:331). This is exactly what the 3 “ladies of the night” have done; the exception in their case is that they were NOT “harshly & cruelly separated from ACMTC. MS tried to get herself right (read her 8 hand-written letters); Sarah & Julie left without saying a word why? All 3 went to the “Gentile ways”. MS now claims to be an agnostic. We’ve heard that MS & Julie have turned lesbian. Julie was a bisexual when she joined us at the age of 16. Sarah speaks of her “partner” – a man or a woman?

I have a dozen more quotes from Cyprian: “If we reject the repentance, … it will be attributed to us in the day of judgment…” (A.D. 250, 5:331); “… It is one thing to be in suspense until the sentence of God at the day of judgement…” (A.D. 250, 5:332); “… some of the bishops here in our province thought that peace was not to be granted to adulterers. so they wholly closed the gate of repentance against adultry.” (A.D. 250, 5:332);

One can see that the early Church Fathers had to deal with sins, especially sexual sins.

“… we should be as much separated from them (the wicked) as they are deserters from the Church…. if they heap together curses & threats, let them be rejected.” (A.D. 250, 5:347);

“If they obstinately persevere & do not mutually separate themselves, let them know that they can never be admitted by us into the Church with their immodest obstinacy…. They should not think that the way of life or of salvation is still open to them (Cyprian cites Deut. 17:12, 13).” (A.D. 250, 5:358);

“The proud 7 disobedient are slain with the Sword of the Spirit, in that they are CAST OUT of the church…” (A.D. 250, 5:358);

“We must separate from a believer who lives irregularly & contrary to discipline,” he cites Paul’s “depart from all brethren who walk disorderly & not according to the tradition that you have received from us” (see 2 Thes. 3:6, 7, 11) (A.D. 250, 5:551);

“The sinner must be publicly reproved. In the first Epistle of Paul to Timothy, it says: ‘Rebuke those who sin, in the presence of all.’” (see 1 Tim. 5:20) (A.D. 250, 5:552).

Harrison Hill, the “expert in cults”, needs to read the Bible. He judges us according to his twisted secular mind. He rails on us for rebuking/judging MS et al. but here he is doing the exact same thing. May I suggest that he (or anyone else) research the Scriptures & see if we were WRONG in dealing with the sin of adultery. Paul tells us in his second epistle to Timothy, “rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering & teaching,” 2 Tim. 4:2. Titus 1:13 instructs us to “rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.” Titus 2:15 follows up with “… exhort, & rebuke with all authority. Let no one despise you.” Well, good luck with that – you will be HATED & DESPISED if you dare to call sin, sin. The Lord says in Rev. 3:19, “As many as I love, I rebuke & chasten. Therefore be zealous & repent!”

Gregory Thaumaturgus(210-275 A.D.)

“Covetousness is a great evil…. Robbery is declared to be a horrible thing, something to be abhorred…. And all persons of that spirit are excommunicated from the Church of God.” (A.D. 255, 6:18).

What these 3 “ladies of the night have in common (besides lying) is they were extremely covetous of Gen. Deborah’s position, Jealous! To this day they WISH she were dead! Yep! DEAD! But it is God who elevates persons. Deborah never sought for the position/ministry she was given. She was content on praying for people, not preying on people as she is accused by these 3 liars & Hill himself. He literally mocks her dedication, her prayer life. Read his non-fiction, “fiction” book for yourself. He has put himself in a very dangerous position as judge & executioner.

Apostolic Constitutions (compiled in A.D. 390):

“If anyone is convicted of having done a wicked action… that causes the whole body of the Church & its teaching to blasphemed, … the bishop must boldly reject such a person upon proof – unless the person changes his or her course of life” (A.D. 390, 7:399);

“Sin that passes by without correction grows worse & worse & spreads to others… Likewise, one diseased sheep, if not separated from those who are well, infects the rest…. Therefore, if we neglect to separate the transgressor from the church of God, we will make the Lord’s house a den of thieves.” (A.D. 390, 7:403);

Here is a long quote made short: “If anyone hardens himself, ‘tell it to the Church. However, if he or she refuses to listen to the Church, let them be to you as a Gentile… reject them as a pagan. However, if they are willing to repent, receive them…. As to those who are convicted of any wicked action & have not repented – you should view them as… pagans…” (390 A.D., 7:414);

“If anyone prays with a person who has been excommunicated – even in the house – let him be suspended.” (A.D. 390, 7:501).

We can see that the early Church believed in excommunication, rebuking, shunning & repentance.

Part 8

Matthew 18:15 says, “Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, & whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

John 20:23 says, “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”

Clement of Alexandria wrote: “Those who fall into sin after baptism are those who are subjected to discipline. For the deeds done before baptism are remitted [in baptism]. However, those committed after baptism are purged [through discipline].” (195 A.D., 2:438);

Tertullian wrote: “… by treating of a remedial repenting yet in reserve, we seem to be pointing to a yet further space for sinning… Let no one repeat his sin as often as he is forgiven. Otherwise, be sure he will find an end of escaping, when he will not find an end to sinning…” (A.D. 203, 3:662); “… if the Lord’s indulgence grants you the means of restoring what you had lost, be thankful for the benefit renewed.” (A.D. 203, 3:663); “We confess our sins to the Lord… Penance (Gk. exomologesis) is a discipline for man’s prostration & humiliation, requiring a demeanor calculated to bring mercy….” (A.D. 203, 3:664); “…. Is it better to be damned in secret than absolved in public?” (A.D. 203, 3:664); “…. Why do you desert your own salvation? Why are you slow to approach what you know heals you?” (A.D. 203, 3:665); “Repentance & her handmaid, penance, he had cast away.” (A.D. 203, 3:666).

We can see, as already stated, Tertullian, a fiery Christian writer (160-230 A.D.), originally supported the Ekklesia’s position that it could extend God’s forgiveness even for very serious sins such a sexual immorality (adultry) if the transgressor were truly repentant. But after adopting the teachings of the Montanists he rejected any forgiveness for such serious sins.

Montanism was a spiritual movement that began in the latter part of the 2nd Century. They referred to their movement as the “New Prophecy”. They were also known as Phrygians or Cataphrygians. Phrygia was the founder, after him came Priscilla & Maximilla, two prophetesses. They taught no forgiveness for post baptismal sins. If this were true, not one of us would make Heaven! One can dig out, if interested, all they did & believed.

In the MS case et al. it would be foolish for us to have had a trial (for her adultery), for we were told that she sinned after her salvation /baptism experience. Tertullian has stated “… come, now, let them (special prophets) … teach us the possibility that the stains of a flesh that after baptism has been polluted again can be washed away by repentance.” (A.D. 212, 4:85); “Inasmuch as He puts such sins [i.e., adultery] & fornication] on the paid side of the account before baptism, He thereby determines them to be irremissible after baptism.” (A.D. 212, 4:91); he goes on to renounce forgiveness after baptism in 4:99 & 4:100.

God’s Spirit continually tells us here, that it is time for ”Repentance Revolution”, meaning the Church & state alike needs repentance!

It is a shame that Tertullian was led to believe that a Christian could never be forgiven of a sin or sins after salvation/baptism. But the Spirit & the Word does say that one can cross the line whereby forgiveness will be impossible. He has told us that MS is such a person. She has had years to repent but refuses to. Although she has (finally) confessed to lying about her “imprisonment” by us. But she continues to tell the media et al. the same o story – “I was held captive, abused, I ESCAPED!” B.S.

Commodianus wrote: “you have become a penitent. Pray night & day. But do not depart far from your mother [i.e., the Church]. For then, the Highest will be able to be merciful to you. The confession of your fault will not be in vain. In your state of accusation, learn to weep manifestly.” (A.D. 240, 4:212);

Origen: “In smaller sins, sinners may do penance for a set time & come to public confession in accordance with the rules of discipline. By imposition of the hand of the bishop & clergy, they receive the right of communion.” (A.D. 250, 5:290); He continues: “Before penitence was fulfilled, before confession even of the gravest & most heinous sin was made… they dare to offer on their behalf & to give them the Eucharist.” He was referring to the bishops laying hands upon the repentant person. (A.D. 250, 5:291);

Cyprian cont.: “We have decided that those who do not repent, nor give evidence of sorrow for their sins with their whole heart, & with manifest profession of their lamentation, are to be absolutely restrained from the hope of communion & peace, even if they begin to beg for them…. For what drives them to ask is not the repentance for sin, but the fear of imminent death.” (250 A.D., 5:333). Cyprian goes on to write about sin & the need of repentance (see 5:445 & 5:447) et al.).

Lactantius wrote: “No one can be so prudent & so cautious as not at some time to slip. Therefore, God, knowing our weakness, out of His compassion has opened a harbor of refuge for man – that the medicine of repentance might aid this necessity to which our frailty is liable.” (A.D. 304, 7:191). I totally agree with him. God is a God or mercy, compassion, & forgiveness – BUT also one whose Mercy, Compassion, and Forgiveness can & will run out if the transgressor abuses His mercies.

Peter of Alexandria says, “Let a penalty of 6 months’ penance be imposed upon them.” (A.D. 310, 6:271);

Apostolic Constitutions: “When he does repent & has submitted to his chastisement, receive him (or her), remembering that our Lord said, ‘There is joy in Heaven over one sinner who repents.’”(A.D. 390, 7:400) (note: for more details see repentance & forgiveness: Repentance, Acts 3:19; 26:20; 1 Jn. 2:1; Heb. 10:26; Rev. 2:5; Mt. 3:2; 4:17; Acts 2:38; Rev. 3:19; 2 Tim. 2:25; Heb. 6:6; 2 Pet. 3:9 etc.) The early Church Fathers had plenty to say about repentance & forgiveness of sins (aka absolution).

In the early Church (aka Ekklesia), absolution was the formal act of a bishop or presbyter in pronouncing forgiveness of sin to a repentant Christian, (Mt. 18:15 & Jn. 20:23 are used).The Roman Catholic Church has used & abused these texts. The early Church Fathers were at odds with the RCC on many acts & doctrines. The RCC is not pure “Christian”!

Part 9

In The Oracle’s Daughter (the 331 page book), chapter 6, Hill writes about Maura Aluzas (later Schmierer): “… when Maura was in the fifth grade, she & her family were invited to a service at a more informal church (her family were Roman Catholic). A guest preacher there spoke vividly of hell & its torments. The underworld was no myth, he said. It was real! Maura never returned to that Church…. It stayed with her as she entered high school. It stayed with her as she grew… tried LSD… Marijuana. Mostly she didn’t think of hell.” Then Hill writes about Maura going into the Bear Tribe / Medicine Rock, leaving & living with a group along the ocean. He goes on to write about her life with other men, not her husbands. He makes her life out to be NOT So Bad! But when he writes about my wife, Deborah, O, he pulls out all stops, flings SH*T all over the place – Deborah is a mean, cunning, abusive religious witch! He goes on to give us a Schmierer/Green history lesson. Then on page 49, Hill begins his mockery: “… when the shadows had begun to lengthen & everyone retreated inside (their cabin at French Gulch, CA.), that the visit (our visit to French Gulch from Sacto. CA.) took a peculiar turn. Maura was in the living room when the MOANING (my emph.) started.” Hill then tries to write how the MOANING sounded: “UNGHHHH. MAGHHHHH. GAHHHHH.” Yep! My wife sounded that stupid. he continues: “She, Jim, & Steve followed the NOISE (my emph.) to the bedroom, where they found Lila (Deborah) curled in a fetal position…” Who told Hill this? I didn’t, Steve didn’t. It was his “queen” Maura, the only SANE one among us! Yep! This dull pot smoking, sexing lady with unkept hair, no shoes, dirty – MS!

Hill continues to write what Deborah sounded like (in prayer): “HUH huh, HUH huh, HUH,” Lila GRUNTED” (my emph.) “… Maura recognized these as the sounds of childbirth.” He continues (p. 49), “Suddenly Lila’s voice broke in to an EERIE (my emph.), trilling falsetto (meaning an artificial way of speaking or singing), ‘wah wah wah wah wah’ (13 times!), lips stammering. Then her voice dropped to resume its HUSKY (my emph.) GRUNTING” (my emph.). If I had heard this, I too would have thought (as Hill/Schmierer did), this lady is crazy!

Hill makes out like MS was the sane one & we were the crazies. But as Hill at least mentions Lilly (their small baby girl) having pneumonia. He writes “Jim prayed over the child, though Maura also took the baby to the doctor.” This never happened, I prayed & God healed her right then & there! A miracle! He goes on: “When Lilly got better, however, Steve (now Col. Phillip Jordan) said it was Jim, not the doctor, who had healed her.” Well, it was the Spirit of God using my prayer that healed her. He cont.: “Maura wasn’t so sure.” Yep!, always doubting. She never really believed in all these “Spiritual” things God did in us & through us. Did God always heal, perform miracles? No! He has used men/medicine as well.

Realize, Real Eyes, Real Lies!

On page 57 of Oracle’s Daughter, Hill writes: “Was it happening? Was Jim & Lila’s nascent ministry transforming into a cult?” By now Hill was wetting his pink panties! A CULT??? Now he can get into the juicy stuff… at last. The Greens are starting another CULT! But he starts out nice enough: “The Green’s ministry, such as it was, remained too open, too integrated into the outside world, to qualify as a cult.” But as Hill writes, things changed! Yep! Sure did. We were no longer a 501 C3 “church”; We dropped this & focused on serious discipline, soldiering so as to go beyond Sacramento, into the HOT ZONES of the world where Militant Islam & Militant Communism had strongholds and where Christianity was under attack.

Hill writes on page 65 (chapter 9): “The Greens weren’t content simply to spread their message (which is not “our” message, but Jesus’, see Mt. 28:19, Mark 16:15) throughout Sacramento, however, or even America.” Thanks for at least telling the truth about the Mt. 28:19, Mark 16:15 commission: “Go ye into ALL the world and preach the Gospel to every creature.”

The Big Lies Start

One page 165, (chapter 9) Hill writes: “Chief among Maura’s sins was her reluctance to BEAT (my emph.) her children.” Yep! BEAT! Does MS or Hill have an ounce of proof this was said? (other than “queen” Maura) MS was a poor mother. She never disciplined her children (leave the BEATING out!). “Maura needed to WHIP (my emph.) him (Stephen, her son) into submission, just as Jim had WHIPPED (my emph.) Sarah & Josh when they were young.” This is not true. Hill writes as though I whipped my kids daily. As I’ve said time & time again, grounding was the disciplining we used most of the time. Sarah lies when she says I beat her daily (in other worldly articles). Hill can’t resist – “In an effort to appease Lila, Maura gave the baby a quick swat on the backside.” Hurrah for her! Now Steve comes into the “whipping party”: “Steve, however, did exactly as Lila directed, THRASHING (my emph.) the baby with a belt until large welts were visible…” Yeah, right. Hill was right there to see those “large welts!”. He did not stop with the “belt beating”, he continues “A former ACMTC member later confirmed that Steve inflicted ‘severe child abuse’ on the child at Ft. Freedom & that the boy was sometimes ‘covered with bruises’.” Well, we’re waiting for Hill to name “that person”. Why withhold a witness’ name to such a crime? Why weren’t the police or CYFD called in? Because it NEVER HAPPENED! In Maura’s testimony under oath, she never mentions this. It would have been the perfect time & place to bring up child abuse charges. After all, “I just wanted to expose them” she told the media.

I have her 25+ page declaration. On pp. 17-19 Maura writes about Stephen (remember, she told the media she could not see her kids for 6 months – only peeking through a crack in the shed – read the PX2 Files). Not a word about whipping or beating Stephen (before-during-or after her “imprisonment”). She writes: “There was a hole/crack in the door of the shed which we used to frequently peek out of. I sometimes was able to watch my children in the backyard playing,” page 8. If she was “LOCKED UP” in a damp, dirty, tiny shed for 6 months (she had told the media many times), she writes on page 12: “My own children were instructed to turn their heads from me. When we entered the yards to work Lila Green always slammed her window or shades to avoid seeing us.” But, wasn’t she LOCKED inside a tiny shed for 6 months? Kids seeing her? Entering the yards to work? What?

Page after page, Hill is transfixed with Maura’s tall tales. He believes everything she spits in his ear. At least he contradicts her with, “People LEAVE (my emph.) cults for a variety of reasons. Some, like Maura, are KICKED OUT (my emph.), while others leave voluntarily,” chapter 15, p. 111. We did not “kick her out”, I personally asked her to leave, get a job until we see which way things go (see her handwritten letters, PX2 Files). Hill, most of the time uses certain trigger words to stir up (more) hatred for ACMTC (especially Gen. Deb.)

Brain Washed?

Well, after reading her account of her stay with us, one will see that her brain didn’t function properly to begin with. If we did “Brainwash” her, who deprogrammed her? Why doesn’t she give specifics? Who was the person or persons that brought MS back into normality? Name please! Hill discusses cults, brainwashing, & the deprogramming process (pp. 111, 112). Hill has to admit, “Maura Schmierer didn’t participate in anything like formal exit counseling,” p. 112. Why she didn’t is BECAUSE she was never “brainwashed”!!! This “B” word has given the nation fatigue. It has been used so much it has no meaning left.

Theologian Maura, Hill writes, “realized Jim & Deobrah had mischaracterized parts of the Bible,” p. 113. If she actually believed this, why has she become an agnostic? Why didn’t she point out our Biblical errors? We’re waiting for an answer. And you, Mr. Hill, you too believe we are not real Christians – show us where we are not! We’re all waiting. Is it because we stand against homosexuality?

Part 10

This article is basically about sexual immorality (1 Cor. 5:1) & the consequences of it (v. 5). We have seen how Paul the apostle dealt with this particular kind of sexual sin (incest), we have seen that Paul uses the words “sexual immorality” (2 times) & “sexually immoral” (3 times). He calls the one who was guilty, “evil person” (vs. 13). Then Paul, in chapter 6, tells those at Corinth that “fornicators”, “idolaters”, “adulterers”, “homosexuals” (a new coined word in the NKJV) & “sodomites” (the correct word for the abomination). He goes on to mention non-sexual sins/abominations in vs. 10. He again uses the word “sexual immorality” in vs. 13. In vs. 15 he uses the word “harlot”, & in vss. 17 & 18 he again uses the word “sexual immorality”. He proceeds in chapter 7 with “sexual immorality” (vs. 2). I point all this out for you folks that think sexual sins don’t matter to God. Paul had to deal with sexual sins; the early Church Fathers did the same; all who live godly in Christ will be faced with having to deal with these sins in one way or the other. We – ACMTC – have been “JUDGED” by both the liberal Christians & the secular world for judging one who was/is guilty of adultery. For decades now! But to let sexual immorality go unchecked is sin in itself! Paul says in 1 Cor. 6:18 to “FLEE sexual immorality”, do not do it or cover for it.

“Flee from Porneia”

(1 Cor. 6:18)

An identical prohibition of idolatry (mentioned in his sexual vice list of 6:9 = the “worship” of sex?) appears in 10:14 = “Flee from idolatry.” The Gk. words “flee from” is the present imperative, implying “keep running from”. We find Paul writing nearly the same thing in 2 Tim. 2:22: “Flee also youthful lusts…” But “lusts” are not limited to youth. In 1 Tim. 6:11 we find Paul, again, using the word “FLEE”: “But you, o man of God, flee these things…” What things? For one, “the love of money”, vs. 10. Paul says the love & lust of it will be accompanied with all kinds of evil.

So, we are instructed to FLEE from things that DAMN our souls. Instead of lusting/loving evil things, we’re instructed to“Fight the good fight of faith,”1 Tim. 6;12. Oh NO, not FIGHT? Yep! This was/is the basic foundation of ACMTC. Yet, we are told that God does not have an army. Sorry about that. Paul says, “wage the good warfare” (1 Tim. 1:18), to “endure hardship as a good SOLDIER of Jesus Christ” (2 Tim. 2:3). Even if Paul would have used the words “good Church-goers”, verse 4 still uses the word “warfare”. (see all my posted articles on AggressiveChristianity.Net. page 1 under Spiritual Warfare where I have 34 articles, plus many more on our other sites).

So, with a double asyndeton (Gk. = untied with) Paul says (lit.): “Flee from sexual immorality. Every sin, whatever it is a man (or woman) commits, is outside the body, but he (or she) who commits sexual immorality sins against his (her) own body.”

I remember the day when one of the men told us (Col. Phillip & Gen. Deborah were going through an old shed (later torn down) on the property we just purchased (Ft. Freedom), this man (who had lived with the Schmierers for a short while at French Gulch) said Maura “liked it”, referring to his pen*s. We asked was this before her “conversion”? He indicated that even after it. The second man, member of ACMTC (the first older man was not, just a helper), told us the same thing – “down by the river in a van.” Well, we all knew MS was sexually unclean. But there were times she did try to be a dedicated Christian. We’ve all struggled thru the sin “minefield” of life. I know I had my many struggles in this area – I was a fornicator in the world. Just because I changed with salvation, this in no wise stopped the “sexual” attacks. I had to “FIGHT like HELL”, I mean “FIGHT AGAINST HELL” these lust spirits. Thank God that God has helped me, I have remained TRUE to Deborah ever since Dec. 1971! I was 26 when I gave up my old sinful life. I just turned 81! (June 2026). You see, both Deborah and I had been into the world of sex-sins (never homo/lesbian!). After our marriage covenant with each other & to the Lord Jesus, we have lived for Him & been faithful to each other. Although MS failed in this area, the Bible says one can repent & be forgiven (unless reprobate!). We can also be a “spiritual fornicator” by lusting for and loving the things of the world. We MSUT embrace the Spirit & the Cross. We must learn to DIE (cross) to what we lust/love. The body is included in the full redemptive work of Christ, hence, we MUST glorify Christ in our bodies as well as in our souls/spirits. You see, the body is the temple/shrine of the indwelling Spirit, therefore we’re to keep it clean & healthy. Porn, these days, among “Christians”, is epidemic!

The Big Ugly Picture

The Christian Church, sadly, has become more & more loose in sexual mores. In most Western cultures, where sexual mores have blatantly moved toward pagan standards (with exceptions), the doctrine of the sanctity of the body needs to be heard, once again, LOUD & CLEAR. Sexual immorality within the “straight”, i.e., heterosexual, Church is not being addressed enough. Is it because of the leadership are guilty or is it because they fear persecution – from the “saints” or from the “sinners”, or both?

Part 11

Cult, Cult, Cult

On page 159 of the Oracle’s Daughter, Hill writes: “… The Greens began to embrace the word (‘cult’) critics had hurled at them relentlessly. ‘We count it a privilege to be called a cult,’ Jim wrote. ‘We are a cult of the Living God’ … I obediently follow my ‘cult’ leader, Jesus Christ the Lord.’” (see my articles on “cult”) So, all this “cult” stuff doesn’t really bother us, although I make mention of it the way the world & Churchianity uses it. They use it as a weapon to demonize.

Meanwhile

Chapter 30, page 214, Hill starts out with “Meanwhile, Maura”. He delves into “It was the late 2000s, around the time Trinity (aka Miracle Green) came forward with her allegations (LIES!) of sexual abuse, & almost 20 years since Maura’s EXPULSION (my emph.) from the group.” Again Hill tells his readers that MS was expulsed, excommunicated, kicked out!, something MS herself had for years & years claimed she ESCAPED (my emph.).

On the same page Hill says “Maura was certified as a registered nurse…” Yep! This poor psychological disturbed, brainwashed “victim” got a good education/job off the $$ she STOLE from ACMTC. She was envious of Deborah’s several positions at the Sacramento Medical Center. Same hospital, Hurrah, Maura, you finally became an equal! Well, not so fast – you LIED on us, stole our properites & took the $$ and got educated. Deborah got her good jobs the honest way – being smart enough to pass all required tests (some of which there were over 100 who applied (with Univ. degrees!), but Deborah got the best job. So, this poor brainwashed, psychologically abused “victim” didn’t do so bad in the world. But got an “F” in Biblical Chrisitanity.

The End

Hill’s Epilogue (pp. 267-277) contains things said about Deborah & Maura, & me. Hill begins with “The hand writing was girlish, neat, almost cute. But the message was dead serious.” Here is the message Deborah wrote: “I, Deborah Green, am currently incarcerated in WNMCF where I am serving a 72 year sentence… for sexual molestation & penetration of a minor child (Miracle/Trinity). However, there’s now medical evidence proving I did not molest or ‘penetrate’ the child in any way whatsoever.” There you have it dear readers: the State LIED & CHEATED in order to convict, imprison my wife on FALSE CHARGES. Deborah told me later that she fasted 40 days on water only! This was some feat. We had fasted many times thru the years, some long, some short. But 40 days in lock up / lock down is pretty impressive. She told me she spent much time praying for her enemies, esp. Sarah & Maura, (which she had done outside prison).

Hill goes into detail about Deborah’s lawyers (actually it was Peter’s attorney, Kari Morrissey (a lesbian!) who discovered what she described in a court filing as “exculpatory material that had been INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD by the State.” Yep! HIDDEN so as to send Deborah, God’s prophetess to prison for life!!! I’m sure Hill did not want to print this – but he did. And I’m equally sure the “Ladies of the Night” – Maura, Julie & Sarah – did not want this to be true. It was TRUE: the State lied/cheated to put an innocent woman behind bars for life! They KNEW what happens to child molesters in prison – DEATH! But, you see, Deborah was not / is not just an ordinary woman, she is God’s servant. If I can borrow Hill’s words, she is the “Oracle of God”.

Another Point

Hill makes another point clear (in our favor). On the same page (267) he writes about “Trinity’s 2006 hospitalization,” which for years we’ve been accused of not allowing anyone to go to the hospital or see a doctor.

One can read about all these things in our PX3-5 Files.

It was the state that took Miracle from us after we admitted her to the hospital (ABQ., N.M.) with a broken leg (swing accident). She was later placed in a foster home where she really was molested: later Miracle admitted that Deborah did not sexually or physically abuse her, but the foster care person.

Hill goes on to mention Deborah’s prosecuting (Assistants) attorneys Mandana Shoushtari, & Brandon Vigil (also Peter’s PAs). Both of these anti-Peter/anti-Deborah attorneys were caught in sexual misconduct. So much for sexual immorality!!! Besides this, Vigil was found to have engaged in prosecutorial misconduct.

Julie Gundino – Serial liar!

Julie had been with ACMTC for years. She was Captain when she & hubby, also a Captain, decided to steal around $10,000 worth of goods from us. They took off like the others. Escape? Not hardly. They both were sellers, and were away from camp weeks at a time. But to my point, Julie claimed “she’d seen Deborah go with Trinity into the bathroom, where some of the alleged abuse was said to have taken place,” writes Hill (p. 269). Julie fails to mention that Miracle was a cripple, wheelchair bound – was she able to get in & out of the bathtub by herself. It was Deborah who assisted her 95% of the time and cared for Miracle. I also helped in wheeling her to & from the mess hall / meeting hall. Others also helped.

SANE

SANE examinations performed by Dr. Larroque in which her findings proved that Miracle had not been sexually or psychologically abused (2006). The state withheld this vital info. from being used in Deborah’s trial. (see “Motion for a New Trial…” AggressiveChristianity.Net. page 1, under “General Deborah Found Not Guilty & Released!”

Hill writes: “It was also true that an examiner had been unable to ‘confirm or deny sexual abuse’ on Trinity’s evaluation in 2006.” This is not true. The two SANE exams proved that Miracle was never sexually/psychologically abused by Deborah. It is on record that the 2 SANE exams found no ABUSE of any kind. (note: if you have OD book, read Hill’s Epilogue).

Where is Hill’s Condemnation?

After Hill writes about the State’s malfeasance, I don’t read where he is a bit outraged: “members of the jury at Deborah’s trial had known about all of this, & yet they’d still find her guily on almost all counts.” Where is his outrage against these liberal, dishonest ACMTC HATERS? But Deborah’s new trial won! She was found NOT GUILTY! How did Maura, Julie, Sarah et al. react to Deborah being set free? Hill tells us on page 270: “Former ACMTC members were angry & frustrated…” Yep! These “righteous” un-righteous “Ladies of the Night” were really pissed off that their machinations didn’t work in the end. Just shows us the sheer DEPRAVITY of their hearts – all 3 of them GUILTY of sex-sins themselves!!! Maura is quoted: “There’s the N.M. legal system for you.” HA! NO! There is the JUSTICE of Almighty God for you! N.M. is totally corrupt. All honest attorneys will tell you this. We have experienced their malfeasance, their malpractice, their malodorous (stinking!) “justice”.

Just where is Hill’s condemnations of the State of N.M. for putting innocent Deborah behind bars… to be murdered by other inmates? I think he wished she would have died in prison so as to ease his conscience.

WOS 8/4/26 – Rebellious are Contagious

I speak unto you this day and I say that the ones who are rebellious towards Me, My Son, My Spirit and My True Followers are full of spiritual diseases. They are to be openly rebuked and refuted for they are contagious. When such ones are allowed to slip into congregations, house churches, gatherings, and outreaches to sinners, they secretly are sowing rebellion. Know they are sent by the devil and they are full of demons who will erode the faith of those who are weak in the faith.

Then, people find what was once alive has now become dead spiritually because people are more intently interested in doing what they want rather than doing what I want. There is no longer a desire to see the lost and dying saved by believing upon Jesus as My Son, and confessing to Him their sins. Where there was once a burning desire for the Lord, the people now lust for the things of the world and will follow the world’s trends and their morality as well.

This is what has happened in places where people are too comfortable and complacent in their Christianity, they refuse to admit that they are being influenced by the rebellious. However it is only too evident by their values, by their choices, and by their attitudes that they are bound up in the miseries that come of refusing to rebuke and refute rebels.

Usually in the natural sense, medical personnel will tell you that if anyone comes into the facility, if what they are diagnosed with is contagious, they are put in an isolation room by themselves and kept separate from others. This is so that whatever they are suffering from does not infect others. Those who are contagious may not be rebels but whatever disease or sickness is diagnosed as contagious keeps them from having contact with others.

Stop and consider that the rules made by the administration of hospitals and clinics are for the benefit of the whole as well as the person who is contagious because if such a one has a compromised immune system, they could be left open to more infections.

Yet, the overseers of those who are calling themselves Christians are unwilling to mark the ones who are rebels and warn others so that they will not become rebellious likewise. I do not want My people who are operating under the Holy Spirit discernment to keep quiet over what they perceive by this supernatural power. They should go to the overseers and alert them to what they see and know. Then they have not hid the Truth by neglecting to make the overseers aware of the presence of a rebel or rebels who have slipped in to cause trouble.

This day be thankful unto Me that you can, through the Power of Jesus’ Name and the Power in His Blood, call out demons and command them to get out and go where Jesus sends them. This is because when anyone is adhering to and using that Name, those demons know they cannot stand to remain in such a person or persons they have been in and around.

Likewise do not be too proud to admit if you have demons attempting to enter or are already hiding in you which are full of poison; do not be holding on to such dark and deadly spirits. Rather, rebuke and refute such evil powers and command them to leave you in the Name of Jesus and by the Blood of Jesus, they are no longer able to remain.

Reality is that none of you is to assume you are more spiritual than I and just as the Apostle had the woman following him who had the spirit of darkness and who interrupted him repeatedly, he took authority and cast out the demons inhabiting the woman.

Those who are walking in the steps of Jesus will understand that there is the intensity of Spiritual Warfare being waged every single day and it is the job of My people to stay fit. What is meant by staying fit means they are not meant to carry the excess weight of demon spirits and be taken down by them. They are to stay alert, alive, active, and aggressive for The Truth and be persistent in bearing witness of My Kingdom wherever and however the Spirit directs them to do.

Those who are Mine are meant to remain on duty and not become too comfortable, complacent, and compromising in all they do. No, they are to come forth knowing for sure they must keep themselves pure and not succumb to the rebellious and by such become contagious.

My people are not meant to take up idols and then to try and defend their idolatry when they are rebuked for the same. Rather they are to humble themselves and dispose of their idols and command such demonic forces out of themselves. Those who choose to keep their idols because they love them more than Me are siding with the devil, his demons, depression, despair, death, and damnation.

Do not allow rebellion to remain in your own hearts, but be actively waging war against such forces and do not think you can get by because of your outward works. What really matters, and you must remember this, is Relationship, not Religion. If you want an alive relationship with Me as your God, My Son as your Savior, My Spirit as your guide and other Faithful Followers of Jesus Christ, take action against such rebellion.

CAUTION: If any website, app or email claims to be representing ACMTC H.Q., and is asking for money, IT IS NOT US! We have never solicited for funds. Please report suspicious sites to us via email. Thank you.