By: Gen. Jim – 3/1/26
We received info concerning the documentary “Inside the Militant Christian Cult…” in which the term “Divine Bitch” was used in ref. to Maura Schmierer, a long time ACMTC adversary who filed a $20 million dollar lawsuit against us back in 1988 (See our articles/videos related to this event, our Px2 & Px3 Files). “Dear Gen. Jim….your old nemesis & antagonist Maura Schmierer, the Divine Bitch, is still complaining….”, a portion of a letter sent to me.
D.B.!? That’s an interesting term I’ve never heard. Sure fits M.S. I thought to myself. So I set about to find out where this term came from or was it coined by the author of the letter. So I went to my 960 page Dictionary of Deities & Demons in the Bible, edited by K.V.D.Toorn, B. Becking, & P.W. Van Der Horst. These authors & editors reference on gods, angels, demons, spirits, & semi divine heroes et al. Have thousands of names/terms. I thought if “DB.” is a real term it should be found in this book. Sure enough, on page 331 under “Fire” (Which I wrote an article on): “The ugaritic goddess ist, ‘fire’, glossed klbt ilm, a Divine Bitch”. (KTU 1,3 iiii45), is united among the deities DEFEATED (my Emph.) by “ANAT.” KTU stands for M. Dietrich, P. Horet & J. San Martin, Diekiel – alphabetische Texte aus Ugarit (AOAT24). AOAT stands for Alter Orient and Altes Testament.
From there I went to the internet under D.B. Here is what I found: “D.B. primarily refers to Deva-Shani (Sanskrit for “divine bitch” or “bitch of the gods”), an epithet for Sarama, a goddess or divine dog in Hindu mythology who assists Indra. It also refers to a 1973 biography of actress Susan Hayward, a 2018 play about bodily experience, & a 2010 adult episode.” In Hindu mythology, Sarama is the ‘DB’ who appears in the Rig Veda & is sometimes depicted as a messenger or goddess associated with the Dawn. As my research continued I found out that “D.B.” is all about the private, unspoken experiences that accompany having a uterus…things are about to get weird!
The whole 1988 lawsuit came about because we relieved Capt. M.S. from her position because of her adultery – which she to this day denies, but nevertheless true. She therefore made up the drama – trauma of being imprisoned by Gen. Deborah & Myself, which decades later admitted she lied! (See all our articles/videos).
Another cite on “D.B.” deals with transgenderism. One can see that the Uganistic goddess of “Fire” no doubt refers to “burning sexual lust”, as well as the modern term deals with the sexual realm.
Remember, ‘D.B.’, among other deities was defeated by Anat. In the D.D.D. in the Bible, there is a long list of refs. where Anat can be found (Index, p.944). On pages 36-43 we find a long article by Prof. P.C. Day in which he traces this name concerning the etymology. Since Anat destroyed/defeated the “D.B.” we need to know what, why, when, where? Day challenges the view that Anat is depicted in the ugoritic texts as a sexually active & possibly reproducing deity. Another historian/scholar, Walls, argue that there is no clear ref. to Anat engaging in sexual intercourse. If Anat was as D.B. (“fire”), we would have two sexual deities at war with each other. As I have discovered, Anat, who defeated D.B., denotes her special associations with “warriors” & with royalty. I could cite dozens of authors I’ve researched & most all rule of Anat as being like “D.B.”. Anat is depicted as a “warrior” with supernatural power (like a Deborah in Judges 4 & 5, who was a special female warrior on the behalf of God/Israel.).
Prof. P. L. Day writes: “Two proposals to see allusions to Anat in the Biblical text and he mentioned briefly, P. G. Graigie (Deborah & Anat: A Study of Poetic Imagery, Judges 5, 1978, pp.374-381) argued that 5 specific features are shared by Anat & the Biblical Judge Deborah”.
It is reported that her name (Anat) appears in the Hebrew Bible as a component of the name Shangar Ben Anat, a warrior reputed to have slain with mere oxgoad 600 philistines (See Jud. 3:31).
See Joshua 19:38 & Jud. 1:33. In the Bible the word Anat is spelled Anath.
In short Prof. Day et al. say that given Anat’s clear portrayal as a warrior & a patron/guardian of warriors (Life Force Team) & royalty in extrabiblical sources, & given that we know she had a temple in Beth Shan, it makes good sense to suggest that the armour of a vanquished warrior-king would be brought to her temple by the victorious & grateful warriors.
It is also argued that a dialect variant of her name is found in the place name vocalized in the Masoretic Text as bet anot.
So, did the author of the said letter know all this when he compared M.S. to D.B.? Interesting