“Spouting off before listening to the FACTS is both shameful and foolish”
Proverbs 18:13, NLT 1
Harrison Hill has already published conjectures, lies and bitter falsehoods against the Generals while deriding ACMTC. He’s planning to publish a book along the same lines by next year. By what he’s already published, it’s clear he hasn’t listened to the facts that contradict him. You know what?
– THE GENERALS NEVER EVEN MET THE GUY.
– HE’S NEVER BEEN TO OUR CAMP. (Embarrassingly, his literary mistakes hint that he’s never looked at a single real-life photo of our home.)
– NO CURRENT MEMBER OF ACMTC KNOWS HIM AT ALL.
– HIS OWN WRITING REVEALS HIS LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE MOST BASIC FACTS, AND MUCH MORE IMPORTANT EVIDENCE, THAT SHOULD LAY THE FOUNDATION FOR ANY BIOGRAPHY ABOUT THE GENERALS.
Conclusion: A man who never met the Generals, never visited, and never talked to a faithful current member of ACMTC, is writing a very personal biography about the Generals by compiling the ramblings of people who hate the ones he’s writing about, and it’s obvious he hasn’t even matched up what they say against the facts. Oh, okay! Sounds like a great idea! I’ve got a question for the reader: How about he uses the same approach for your biography?
I’m a little baffled. Harrison Hill does have a Master of Fine Arts (MFA) in nonfiction,2 yet he has chosen a tabloid fantasy “escape story” as the subject of his premier book?
Enter Janet Cooke, “Jimmy’s World.” Published September 28, 1980, Janet’s nonfiction work about an 8-year-old heroin addict quickly catapulted her to Pulitzer Prize fame. Only, it was all made up. She confessed and returned the Pulitzer, disgracing journalism as a whole. Nonfiction, Hill? Better make sure!
Interestingly, a fantastic explanation about Janet Cooke’s folly was written by Mike Sager in 2016, “The fabulist who changed journalism,” featured in Columbia Journalism Review, published by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, whose parent institution is none other than Harrison Hill’s alma mater.
You can understand why we have our eye on “The Oracle’s Daughter.” Verbal assaults and character assassinations founded (funded?) by hateful liars against General Deborah in particular have gone far enough. Scandalous journalism is something I hope Hill is willing to walk away from.
“Why don’t you all just offer your own statements to these journalists?” you might be asking. Sure, we get asked for “a statement” from time to time. Genuinely? In our experience, no. If you’ve never been investigated by reporters, maybe you don’t understand what I’m talking about. Most reporters and journalists aren’t genuinely interested in the well-being of the accused.
A while back, Harrison did ask to speak with General Jim. Not knowing what Harrison’s intentions were at the time, he was denied an interview. However, our written “Px2 Files,” the other side of the story, was ever available. Those files are jam-packed with indisputable facts. You want eyewitness testimonies? They’re in there. Real PROOF? It’s there: names, dates, timelines, personal histories, quotes, personal letters, responses, confessions, rebuttals. All documented.
A genuine person would love to pour over those writings and do some fact-checking. Being open to common sense, you just can’t come away from fact-based testimonies and accept the bitter fiction anymore.
Harrison must not have done his due diligence. “The Oracle’s Daughter” is proof.
Recently (Summer 2025), Harrison’s “fact checker” emailed us. Perhaps Harrison has caught wind that we’re investigating him? His “fact checker” assaulted us with loads of loaded questions that are easily answered by any average man or woman who knows the “Px2 Files.” Hill’s team needs to read those files first. All of them.
I wonder if the “fact checker” ever launched a couple hundred questions at Sarah, or Maura, or any of Hill’s sources? I don’t mean generic questions. I mean, did Hill and associates turn the accusations around and grill the accusers with the same malevolence that has been used to interrogate the Generals?
Time to keep going with our investigation.
Double Standards
“To mark her status as an oracle of the divine, Lila began calling herself Deborah, after the only female judge in the Bible.” 3
It’s interesting how people malign the character of other people by making very normal circumstances seem evil. For example, if a Hollywood actor changes their name (which happens all the time), then they are usually praised or at least accepted for their creativity. If a painter, writer, journalist or musician uses a pen name or a stage name, that’s perfectly normal. Nicknames are very common. “Pet names” are fine. But Lila wasn’t allowed to change her name as she felt led by God? Is it the name-changing Hill doesn’t like, or that God is involved? Was Lila not allowed to practice her faith without being criticized?
Did you know God changed people’s names in the Bible? It’s another integral part of Christianity that Mr. Harrison Hill and company are apparently mocking.
Hill wrote, “She also gave the group a new name, one that better telegraphed its growing militancy. …Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps.” 3 Oh, yes, people pick on the name “Aggressive” without respectfully asking what it represents. Hill SHOULD know. We’ve addressed it plain as day on our main website HERE, in publications and in various printed responses to our critics over the years.
We are AGGRESSIVE against sin, self (the carnal nature) and satan. Romans 8 verses 5 and 13 declare, “For those who are living according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh [which gratify the body], but those who are living according to the Spirit, [set their minds on] the things of the Spirit [His will and purpose] . . . for if you are living according to the [impulses of the] flesh, you are going to die. But if [you are living] by the [power of the Holy] Spirit you are habitually putting to death the sinful deeds of the body, you will [really] live forever.” 4 Paul describes the Christian life in WARFARE terms: “Thou therefore endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ” (2 Timothy 2:3). Jude verse 3 tells us to “contend for the faith,” which literally means “to contend about a thing, AS A COMBATANT.”5 Hence we are spiritually AGGRESSIVE.
Facts here, people! Not feelings or character assassinations! Not hatred for Christians! Not hated for … women?
Trampling on Women
Speaking of Deborah: “Here was a woman in an authority position that history, custom, and Scripture had all conspired to deny her. But no one could deny Deborah . . . It remained mysterious how Deborah reconciled her dominance with the Bible’s calls for female submission.”3
How does that hit you? It seems a bit misogynistic to me. Not what I first expected! Harrison uses the popular patriarchal-type Christian view against Deborah, as if that’s the only Christian view out there. “[Deborah] and Jim had always interpreted Scripture to conform with their own ideas.”3 That’s an unscholarly statement. Spiritual Christians have had women in ministry positions since Jesus rose from the dead (cf. Romans 16:7, Philippians 4:3, et al.), and religious Christians have always been split on the issue: some agreeing, many disagreeing. Currently, there are at least 7 major denominations that ordain women in the ministry.6 So it’s ignorant to say that Deborah, called by God to leadership, was just her and Jim coming up “with their own ideas” like they invented some unheard-of practice.
(General Deborah Green)
Throughout Christian history, God used women in leadership roles, despite ancient culture (and at times, to spite ancient culture that He did not ordain). Want the facts on that? Read THIS for starters. Don’t forget, the first “missionaries” and eyewitnesses of Christ’s Resurrection were women, — an intentional act by Jesus — at a time when the testimony of women meant nothing (e.g., read Mark 16:1-11). General Jim put together a whole series on this subject. Very compelling! Find those powerful articles HERE.
Why the character assassination? To make the Greens into “weird people.” That’s what this misinformation is about. It’s groundwork, to “spook people,” so the disgruntled can hit you with horrible allegations against Deborah – and you’ll believe them at face value! – since you already think she’s strange. Yet even the horrible allegations are just words: not a single medical report, psychiatric report, or shred of physical evidence to verify anything.
Guess what? We have the medical reports, psychiatric reports, and physical evidence to verify that the accusers are LIARS. Stay tuned. It’s forthcoming.
Who can be trusted?
Lump all of Sarah’s personal gripes together about how she was raised, and remember that Sarah now apparently sees things that aren’t there and remembers things that weren’t ever real. We’ve proven that. She can’t be trusted.
Sarah says, “My dad did this … and my mom did that …” And we’re supposed to believe that just because “she says”? Know what I think? I think if we had an actual photo of what Jim and Deborah supposedly did to Sarah, the “abuse” would be as glaring as the giant stone wall at the Fence Lake property! “Oh, but others have made the same type of claims as Sarah!” you reply. Sure. These “others” are bitter ex-members, just like Sarah; troubled addicts and mentally unstable people; people looking to make a name for themselves by slandering someone who offended them.
Preaching produces ENEMIES
The Generals preach God’s Word. Preaching against sin not only makes people uncomfortable, it makes some RAVING MAD! Some get violent. Some get vengeful.
Has Harrison done a background check on all his sources, or wondered what type of people he’s dealing with? The Generals often worked with some of the worst: addicts, prostitutes, gang members, mentally unstable people. People like that can snap when they hear preaching against their sins, and eventually, if they don’t let God deal with sin in their hearts, they retaliate at the messenger. It’s very common. Do a little research on preachers like John Wesley, who endured being pelted with tomatoes, dirt clods, verbal assaults and mob violence. Disgruntled men and women lied about him, too, accusing him of heresy! 7
Let’s not forget Jesus, our Lord! They CRUCIFIED Him for what He preached!
Have you ever considered that bitter individuals could have gotten together to plot revenge against General Deborah because they were offended? We know they network. We’ve talked with people who’ve talked with them on the phone. We’ve read their online chats and their published works. Has anyone ever bothered to question them about a possible collusion?
Who should you believe?
Many ACMTC members who lived in Fence Lake the whole time would quite frankly say the exact opposite of what Sarah says. Notably, these very lucid people don’t see rock walls that aren’t there, they don’t remember little old Shelty dogs as rabid Cane Corsos who “prowled the property,” and they don’t make up stories about being oppressed by Jim and Deborah who actually sacrificed a lot to accept leadership roles in the Body of Christ. Obviously, the Generals gave their children the best possible loving, Godly and moral upbringing. Will you blindly believe a woman who is lying about her “escape” and may legitimately have mental issues?
Seriously, does Sarah believe her own accusations? I hope not. It’s bad enough to lie, but to believe your own lies? Yeah, that’s scary when you “remember” things that weren’t there.
Readers, if you take everyone at their word alone, people will take advantage of you.
Furthermore, “Innocent until PROVEN guilty” still applies. I believe the word “PROVEN” is the key word in that sentence. I don’t see the word “accused” anywhere.
It’s hard when tears fall to remain objective. Don’t let an emotional story blind you to the facts. People can make up horrible stories, horrible lies. Stick to the facts.
We’re putting our facts out there for examination. Please, examine the details. As we give you physical evidence, photographic proof, medical proof and psychiatric proof, be like the Bereans in Acts 17:11-12. “These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.”
——————–
1 “Proverbs 18 (NLT) – Spouting off before listening to.” Blue Letter Bible. Web. 20 Jun, 2025. <https://www.blueletterbible.org/nlt/pro/18/13/s_646013>.
2. Hill, Harrison. “Homepage.” harrisonwashere, n.d., http://harrisonwashere.com/.
3 Hill, Harrison. “The Oracle’s Daughter.” New York Magazine, The Cut, June 8, 2021, www.thecut.com/2021/06/sarah-green-escaped-mother-cult.html. Accessed 1 May 2025.
4. “Romans 8 (AMP) – For those who are {living}.” Blue Letter Bible. Web. 21 Jun, 2025. <https://www.blueletterbible.org/amp/rom/8/5/s_1054005>.
5. Vine, W. “Contend (-ing) – Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words.” Blue Letter Bible. 24 Jun, 1996. Web. 14 Jun, 2025. <https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/Dictionary/viewTopic.cfm>.
6. Gryboski, Michael. “Women’s History Month: 7 Christian denominations that voted to allow female ordination.” The Christian Post, March 7, 2021, https://www.christianpost.com/news/7-christian-denominations-that-allow-women-to-be-ordained.html
7. Google search “John Wesley accused of heresy” to verify what I said. Critics still rail on him! Calvinists were his main opposition.